There's a "note" related to this changeset: note/578721

Hi xtianprz.
In this changeset you moved this node: node/4174292501/history . It's the end of an address interpolation line, which now looks wrong (cuts across a few streets) I guess that was a mistake?

You seem to be deleting all data as it is added by during a mapathon event this evening. This includes new mappers having their first OpenStreetMap edits stamped out. We also see you sabotaging the tasking manager validation statuses (This project https://tasks.hotosm.org/project/3913 ) I'm sitting here with @Jorieke%20V and she showed me some private messages you've had with her explaining your actions a few days ago. This should be shared (here for example) so that we can discuss more publicly.

I don't see any good justification for deleting data in realtime as it is added, creating a dreadful tangled mess in the editing history. If a deletion is necessary, this should discussed and executed at a later date to leave a clean history.

Thanks for adding Galerie Bartoux. Welcome to OpenStreetMap! I've just been adding some more shops and galleries down New Bond Street, although there's a few more still to add.

I guess we can delete this node now node/3204292660#map=19/53.56704/-1.80067 .

On the web that business seems to no longer exist. The website wsiyorkshire.co.uk redirects to something else with no Holmfirth address.

ok yeah "description:de" (changed it)

That's what I thought at first, but apparently it is the "title" of the work: http://www.artnews.com/2017/06/12/it-tolls-for-thee-cerith-wyn-evanss-skulptur-projekte-munster-piece-is-nearly-imperceptible/ Unfortunately the art world has no rules about choosing sensible length of title. Certainly we don't want to make it worse with a german translation in the same tag, but beyond that i'm not sure what we should do about it in our map data really.

Hi JenLynn07. Thanks for you help with the Hurricane Irma mapping response.

Some important feedback on your contributions though. I noticed you're adding some points of interest with source=Google Maps . We're not actually allowed to create data in OpenStreetMap by copying from google maps. We're creating a free open licensed map of the world. It must not be a copy from a copyrighted map.

Review requested? I live near here and I happen to know there are some trees here yes. So that is a good first edit.

Welcome to OpenStreetMap Eloise!

Yeah I think all of those footpaths should capture that pretty well. Here we're just talking about this section: osm.org/directions?engine=mapzen_foot&route=53.40921%2C-2.16324%3B53.40958%2C-2.16199#map=19/53.40940/-2.16257 Now foot routable. But somebody might improve it by surveying and adding in whether or not there's pavement under the bridge alongside the big flight of steps mapped there.... except personally I would question the wisdom of starting to add in hyperdetailed pavements-as-footways data, so not sure if anything else is needed really.

Thanks for adding this little playground to the map way/89407044 (6 years ago!)

I was just chatting with some locals about it. Apparently it's called Dalmeny Park and is "under threat" from a planning application: https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/save-dalmeny-park-n7-it-s-under-threat

Good point. Well spotted. So I've added foot=yes to those road sections to fix this. The other way to fix would be to weave the relation along the footways which are there in places... but only in places. As usual, representing pedestrian rout-ability is bit tricky. But yes, certainly this relation should be foot-routable.

I see you added a bunch of jokey things here. "geeky" farmland area. "Some guys gaff" building. Your experiment with editing OpenStreetMap has worked! It made it onto the map. I will tidy up some of this now. Feel free to contribute map information for *real* things in the area :-) You added some footpath details which look good. You're encouraged to add more of this! I'm just connecting those to the nearby road properly.

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. You did three edits around London, all of which were successful experiments. It works! You edited the map!

....but yes to complete the set of three I will now revert this one too. There's no supermarket in the middle of Camden Town station. next step: Have a go at adding something *real* which is missing!

I see this edit was undone. Unsurprisingly there was no need to re-map Buckingham Palace. Already in as a relation with tourism=attraction tag relation/5208404

Certainly it's very bad data which should never have been added, and it would've been a good idea to delete the *whole lot* after it was added, (across the whole massive strip of the himalayas)

It can be corrected mind you. And the thing is it *has* been corrected in some areas: osm.org/#map=10/27.4321/85.1358 Lot of effort. Ideally we would treat the whole thing equally somehow to avoid creating massive inconsistencies in the zoomed out view of the map. I guess we could try to get people to put in woodland in this area in an additive approach instead.

We discussed a funny straight edge of the woodland in Uttarakhand on a note here: note/724221#map=9/30.2745/79.2856&layers=N ...but I see you deleted the whole thing.

I'm removing this building you added in Hyde Park, since it doesn't exist. Thanks for experimenting with editing OpenStreetMap. The experiment worked! Remember your edits *do* change the map, so please only add things which are real :-)

Searching the web for zoos in Saint Marcellin turns up nothing. It seems like you were experimenting Sébastien. Shall we delete this?

Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for adding your cafe in Belsize Park. I live over in Archway myself so I don't know the area so well. But I see you added the cafe twice, so I will remove one of them (the one with less details). Looking at the cafe location, I see the address is 2A, so I guess it replaces an older shop called "Criterion Tiles" we had mapped there previously. Does that sound right? And is there still a 'Violette Café' at 2B?