I found another way here: 496451625 could you please state your sources?

Hi,

the track (and others close by):
way/496451623

was tagged with "access=private" shouldn't it be "vehicle=forestry"?

Lg, Gppes

Hallo, Danke fuer die Anmerkung, wir haben diese Woche OSM Stammtisch, da werden wir den Edit diskutieren, ein lokaler Mapper hat dort recherchiert...

Fuers Protokoll: Ich bin mit diesem Revert nicht einverstanden. EOD.

Hi, can you provide a source for the community centres? What is the purpose of this centres (community_centre:for=*)? Cheers, Gppes

Hi, what's the purpose of this two ways?

way/583995990

way/583995989

Lg, Gppes

Thanks for your reply, sorry for bothering you!

Hi, people in the German forum are wondering about the German name of the following node (name:de=Brueckel) node/5460545204

Can you provide a source for that name?

See the discussion here:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=697830#p697830

Greetings, Gppes

I hope I did not guess wrong, but you seem to be a user from Germany, that's way I opened a discussion here:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61878

Hi, to my opinion this is a mass edit to bend a github discussion on rendering castles in a certain direction.

This edit should be reverted.

Hi, could you please clarify your intentions according to this changeset? Greetings from Austria!

Hi, thanks for your reply. I was referring to the single island with the way id: 573387988 this single island (only this specific case) was completely covered by water and contradicts this section in the wiki:
natural=coastline#Where_is_the_coastline.3F

It wasn't my intention to say you shouldn't map islands at all, but it is possible, that for the specific case mentioned, your tagging is wrong.

I found two errors you really should avoid (before continuing mapping islands):
o Draw the ways so that the land is on the left side.
o Avoid self-intersections.

Maybe you can solve the direction problem, by drawing the lines as if you were walking around the island so that the land _always_ is on your left side. After placing the first node think of sitting right at the place were you put the node and look to the direction, so that the land is on the left side and the sea is on the right side. Start "walking" to that direction and place the next nodes.

I only know Josm, so I can't help you with Potlatch. In Josm the direction of the way only is displayed after selecting the way. Maybe it is the same with Potlatch.

Another question, are you sure, that this "island" should be mapped? way id: 573387988, it probably contradicts the wiki (link above).

Hi, your are creating a reasonable number of "coastline errors", they have quite an impact on rendering wide areas of the map!

Have a look here:
natural=coastline#How_to_enter_the_data

Greetings from Austria, Gppes

Hallo, dieser (und moeglicherweise andere) Changesets von Dir werden derzeit im oesterreichischen Forum diskutiert.

Ein lokaler User hat vor Deinen Edits bereits Adressen eingetragen, wodurch jetzt vieles doppelt ist.

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61805

Lg, Gppes

This changeset of yours (and maybe others) caused duplicate addresses on buildings which already have been mapped by a local user.

That's why we currently have a discussion about your edits in the Austrian forum:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61805

Thanks!

Hallo, ich finde die Grenzen rein technisch gesehen auch suboptimal, ich verstehe zum Beispiel nicht, dass diese den Serpentinen der B115 folgen muessen... ;-)

Ich habe eine technische Frage im deutschen Forum gepostet:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=689860#p689860

Die Ennstaler Alpen als Hauptgebirgszug mit den Eisenerzer Alpen als Untergruppe erscheint fuer mich schluessig, die Ennstaler Alpen reichen ja anscheinend bis Leoben!

Man koennte ueberlegen die kerzengerade Linie durch den Altstadtkern von Eisenerz etwas zu "verbiegen" das sieht auch aus meiner Sicht doof aus!

Stammtisch: Immer eine gute Idee!

Lg, Gppes

The whole thing looks like this here:
relation/2184646

Honestly, I don't know much about the Alpen, I just fixed an area error shown on geofabrik: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/

But please have a look here:
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ennstaler_Alpen

The straight line through Eisenerz looks funny though. Other parts of these borders also have issues to my opinion (like using roads, ...) Still, sorry, I neither have the will nor the idea how to improve that.

Anyway, your deletion won't fix the problems we are talking about. So why not just keeping that curious straight line?

Hi, I restored the line you deleted, thinking it had no purpose, by reverting your changeset. It actually was a member of two relations. Lg, Gppes