Glassman's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 129020568 | about 3 years ago | I don't think amenity=hospital is right. Take a look at amenity=social_facility to see if that fits better. See social_facility=*
|
| 129019340 | about 3 years ago | #TIP: UW Taskar Center has a great website on mapping sidewalks at opensidewalks.com
|
| 129021964 | about 3 years ago | There was already a four way traffic signal at the intersection. If you are adding a pedestrian traffic light for the crosswalk, then the tag is crossing=traffic_signals. Can you review this edit?
|
| 129020962 | about 3 years ago | #TIP: UW Taskar center has a great website on mapping sidewalks at opensidewalks.com
|
| 129017989 | about 3 years ago | #TIP: Square building by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
|
| 128972180 | about 3 years ago | Isn't the building called the Landing and nor Arnies?
|
| 128972072 | about 3 years ago | #TIP: OSM doesn't use descriptive name like name=Building. The tag building=* is sufficient. Can you review this edit and correct the name tags?
|
| 128970926 | about 3 years ago | Great contribution. As you get more involved with OSM you might start questioning highway classifications. The National Forest Development Roads are often just 4wd tracks tagged as highway=track or if they are maintained then highway=unclassified. Because we use British English (OSM was started in England) for our tags, unclassified doesn't mean what you'd think. It's basically a rural residential street. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message. Thanks again.
|
| 128871000 | about 3 years ago | Please consider redrawing the buildings to match the roof line in this changeset and the others you did. If the imagery isn't clear, the background layer on the right side of the editor offers different imagery. Some new some older and some with better imagery quality.
|
| 128870651 | about 3 years ago | #TIP: Square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q". Can you review this edit to improve the houses?
|
| 128870571 | about 3 years ago | #TIP: Building outlines should try to match the roof outline. Can you improve this building?
|
| 128868674 | about 3 years ago | #TIP: Building outlines should typically match the roof line. Also square the building by selecting the outline then just type a "q" Can you review this edit and fix the church outline? Thanks
|
| 128858564 | about 3 years ago | #TIP: Instead of deleting the building, just updates the tags. It also looks like a building from the imagery so building=yes would be appropriate.
|
| 128858504 | about 3 years ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
| 128858389 | about 3 years ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
| 128858339 | about 3 years ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
| 128858295 | about 3 years ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
| 128858209 | about 3 years ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
| 128861810 | about 3 years ago | These houses appear to be in Aurora yet you used addr:city=N Oakland. I changed them to Aurora but feel free to correct if I'm wrong
|
| 128861289 | about 3 years ago | It looks like you accidentally dragged a node. It has been fixed. |