#TIP: OSM spells out street addresses. The reason is software has a hard time unabbreviating. Can you fix the street name and the house address? Let me know if you need help.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116801428

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116799443

It's my understanding that the bollard acts as a blocker to the router so it won't route through it. Check out barrier=bollard#How_to_Map
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116778402

#TIP: Adding what type of traffic can pass the bollard would be helpful to routers. I assume bike and pedestrians are okay to pass.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116778402

#TIP: When removing a business - just remove the business but leave the address. It's likely to be reused.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116726587

The baseball field is still showing on the latest imagery. If it is no longer there then deleting it is appropriate. If it still exists then it's likely to be added back by another mapper. If the field is private, then you could add an access=private. Can you review this edit? Let me know if you have any questions.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116681282

Is US12 really a motorway consider it has an intersection?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116682576

I added a parking aisle in the parking lot you added then connected the footway to the parking aisle. There is no need to connect anything to the parking lot since it's all geospatial so the router should know where to find parking.

BTW - I wasn't sure how people got access to the parking in the lower southwest portion of the parking lot. The imagery seems to show a barrier between the parking on the right and the smaller one on the lower left.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116559563

It looks like you added a building within a building. A better way would be to move Royal Buffet to a node, then add another node for the The Cupple Cakes Queen. Also, Cupple Cakes Queen needs a tag to describe the kind of business it is. Can you update your edit? Let me know if you need help.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116609163

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

One question - you removed the clinic tag from Mid Columbia Medical Center, if it's not a clinic can you add in the correct business tag?
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116598476

I haven't done any seamap edits but would recommend you look at openseamap.org as well as on the wiki at osm.wiki/Seamarks for any help you might need adding these features.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116566948

#TIP: Square building by selecting the outline then just type a "q"

#TIP: We normally add playgrounds with the tag leisure=playground. The structure in the playground would be tagged as you did, playground=structure.

Can you review your edit?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116561784

#TIP: Ideally trails and footways should be connected to roads or existing sidewalks. That allows routers to take people to their end destination. Can you review your footways and make sure they are connected? Let me know if you need assistence.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116559563

The surface was changed by goldfndr 7 months ago on changeset https://osmcha.org/changesets/106430552
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116595659

#TIP: We enter addresses with out abbreviations. The reason is that software has a hard time unabbreviating. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116508622

What is recommended is to add the tag ownership=private. That would tell the routers that it's okay to route on the section of the road but that the driver must have permission.

As I understand, roads signs with the name of pvt just means that it is not maintained by a local governmental agency not that you shouldn't drive on it. You can find those all over the state.

A good example is Southwest 30th Street which serves a number of different homes. If one of them has an event their guests might want to use their GPS to get directions to the house. Marking the road access as private will prevent that.

Thanks for updating the road name.

By marking roads like Southwest 30th Street as private you are preventing routers from taking them to their destination. I recommend only tagging roads as private if their is a no trespassing sign.

If the road is a driveway, but it's tag it is considered private and no tag is needed. Again if it's marked as no trespassing then I add the private tag just to make sure.

Can you review your edits?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116479495

#TIP: I know you didn't add the bridge tag, but it's redundant on a pier.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116281824

It looks much better. My only suggestion is to remove the access=no. That will prevent a router from taking you or a visitor to the front door.

If the driveway is posted as no-trespassing then access=private is appropriate.