Glassman's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 112931267 | about 4 years ago | #TIP: The house looks very large. Since none of the imager shows the house yet, you could either take gpx readings of the corners of the house or just place a node with the address where the middle of the house sits. Let me know if you need any help. |
| 112854537 | about 4 years ago | #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
|
| 112854369 | about 4 years ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
| 112809384 | about 4 years ago | #TIP: We don't typically add the name of the property unless it is signed. I'd suggest removing the Thurston County Schools property name.
|
| 112807405 | about 4 years ago | #TIP: add a tag to classify the type of business. This is a strange case. Maybe amenity=event_venue?
|
| 112852740 | about 4 years ago | SE is usually added as Southeast. Please don't use other maps to verify data. It's likely that the data is copywrite protected. The exception would be local government maps, at least in Washington State.
|
| 112852409 | about 4 years ago | #TIP: typically we don't enter city names in all caps. #TIPS: Street names should be spelled out instead of abbreviated.
|
| 112807226 | about 4 years ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
| 112800358 | about 4 years ago | #TIP: The building outline should just cover the roof. Can up redo the building? You can also create a polygon around the property and add the tag landuse=residential + name=name of apartment complex. Let me know if you need help
|
| 112762383 | about 4 years ago | Can I make a suggestion to limit your edits before saving and uploading? Also, when moving locations, save and upload. Having edits on one changeset in AZ and Washington State are really hard to review. I'll send you more information in a message. Since I mostly review edits in Washington State it will have info that pertains to WA.
|
| 112761140 | about 4 years ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good with one suggestion. #TIP: square building by selecting the outline then just type a "a"
|
| 112494683 | about 4 years ago | Nathon - then thanks for adding them. Let me know if you need help adding NF-114. |
| 112714378 | about 4 years ago | #TIP: square buildings by just selecting the outline then type a "q"
|
| 112600431 | about 4 years ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
| 112602033 | about 4 years ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
| 112563283 | about 4 years ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
| 112517858 | about 4 years ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
| 112513342 | about 4 years ago | We usually tag all of the land around the area as a park. This looks like a playground. Can you fix it?
|
| 112513342 | about 4 years ago | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
|
| 112519775 | about 4 years ago | #TIP: Don't forget to use a new changeset comment.
|