Glassman's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 88382669 | over 5 years ago | Not sure how you did it, but it looks like the house was created with two separate ways instead of an area. It kind of works in OSM. I merged the segments using JOSM to created a polygon building and aligned it to the image. About the only way to fix it with the browser editor, iD, is to delete it and redraw it. Let me know if you have any questions.
|
| 88382720 | over 5 years ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it look good.
|
| 88375920 | over 5 years ago | Tip: roof peaks are usually straight, but when the satellite is not directly overhead, they appear as if there is a peak.
|
| 88370305 | over 5 years ago | Thanks for updating the street name
|
| 88313596 | over 5 years ago | We don't add names to features unless it can be verified by other mappers. Tip: Square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
|
| 88315973 | over 5 years ago | TIP: Change the change set comment when doing new edits. Tip: Try to match the roof outline of the building. To square the building, select the outline then just type a "q"
|
| 88257506 | over 5 years ago | I moved the brew pub to the south and made Friesenburgers a node inside of the building so it doesn't appear that the two share the same space. I also removed the hair dresser since it shared the same address as the brewpub.
|
| 88201048 | over 5 years ago | Is the parking really named Moon Date?
|
| 88187000 | over 5 years ago | Not sure exactly what you want to accomplish. The tail can be tagged abandoned:highway=path. That might keep people from seeing it. Or you could just remove it. It was originally added by Natfoot. He is an active mapper in Washington State. You can also send him a message asking his opinion. @Natfoot to bring up his page to send a message.
|
| 88160295 | over 5 years ago | TIP: select the building outline then just type a "q" to square it.
|
| 88162562 | over 5 years ago | Tip: when removing buildings - copy the addr: tags to a point to save for later use.
|
| 88038193 | over 5 years ago | Sorry - I may not have made myself clear. I agree that the tags you removed needed to be removed. I was just suggesting to also remove the other wrong tags. The original editor should have just tagged it as a pedestrian crossing node where the crossing and road intersected. Instead they tagged it as if it was the kerb. |
| 88038193 | over 5 years ago | Probably should remove the kerb=lowered and tactile_paving=yes. I'm guessing they don't exist in the middle of the road.
|
| 88000082 | over 5 years ago | FYI - the campsite already existed. I merged the two nodes since yours also include a website. |
| 87997170 | over 5 years ago | Wow! One suggestion, I believe the mural is on the building. I might be more appropriate to move the node to the building outline near where the mural is actually located. Let me know if you need help.
|
| 87950164 | over 5 years ago | TIP: A footway would be the equivalent of a sidewalk. I think you mean path which we also call a trail. OSM uses British English for tag names since OSM was started in the UK. Can you update the trail to highway=path?
|
| 87896795 | over 5 years ago | One problem with routers is that they don't refresh OSM data all that often. Some of the good ones do about once a week. Others who knows. Since it was already tagged as access no when you edited it, I would report it to a router. Graphhopper is pretty good about fixing their routing problems. I worked with them on ferry durations. |
| 87896795 | over 5 years ago | TIP: the access=no should be sufficient to prevent routers from using the trail. You can improve it by placing a node where the fence is located with a tag barrier=fence.
|
| 87928599 | over 5 years ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it look good.
|
| 87927477 | over 5 years ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it look good.
|