I merged the 2 short sections of cycleway on 22nd St & M Ave. into a tag on 22nd St to allow routing. The two stand alone section could not be routes.

I agree Sharpes Corner is a problem. Unfortunately, neither the state or county gave much consideration to bikes when designing it. We can add shoulder width to OSM but unless it's visibly marked on the ground, we can't add in a cycle lane. If you are interested in pursuing the issue, SKOG is interested in biking.

Also, you noticed I removed the Northern Tier routes. That route is copyright protected by Adventure Cycling. I even went to someone I know who works for them to confirm its copyright protection.l That's why we use USBR numbering.

The name of the node seems to point to a legal requirement to protect eagles but not a specific area. See https://www.fws.gov/law/bald-and-golden-eagle-protection-act

Can you review this edit to determine if the node should be in OSM? We only document verifiable features.

#TIP: Include the tag addr:city=Tacoma when adding addresses to buildings and businesses.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171805308

I didn't hear back from you so I changed the street back to the original configuration
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171710934

Is South Grand Avenue (WA27) physically split? If not then there shouldn't be a separate way. This should be corrected asap if not.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171710934

It's also a good to add a tag to describe the business of Lux AutoHouse. In the editor, just search for the type of business to add the tag.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171710664

Where you separated North Line Street to connect to West A Street, that should likely be a tertiary_link.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171710664

Can you also add a tag to describe the type of business. The editor allows a search for tags. And the wiki at wiki.openstreetmap.org can also help
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171652066

The latest imagery still shows the airfield. Can you confirm it no longer exists?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171650651

turning loop isn't needed when you actually draw the loop. Can you remove it?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171650111

#TIP: Leave the address node when removing the business. Hopefully a new business will take over the same address making it easier for the next mapper.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171612198

#TIP: check out the ESRI World Imagery. Select the background icon then select ESRI World Imagery for more current views.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171610235

#TIP: Street names are spelled out in OSM. The reason is that software has a hard time with abrevations
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171610180

I believe you should be good now. I also went and fixed the house outlines. Feel free to work on the rest. The City of Pasco has a good database of house numbers. https://maps-cityofpasco.hub.arcgis.com/apps/389edcfba6324ad48c147aa1d25c6878/explore

The only way to remove the changeset comment is to redact the edit. I'm happy to do that if that is what you request.

to change your user name, go to My Profile, upper right, select My Account there you can change your display name. I will say, a lot of people use their real name but if you want more protection, then that isn't a bad idea. Your original user name will exist forever but only your current user name will show on your future edits.

If you switch over to Esri World Imagery, you can see many of the houses as well as roads. To switch imagery in the editor, select the background layer then just hit the ESRI World Imagery. Now you can add the actual building to size.

Also, please don't add personal information to OSM for you and your families safety.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171566199

A couple of things. There is an existing pond, but with the name "Stormwater Pond" - Should that be renamed also?

Second, the county parcel information shows this as private land so a park tag doesn't seem right.

Please review this edit. Let me know if you need any help.

I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171525579

I probably would have just used colour=red but your may be more exact
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171521976

Is this an actual campground site or just a name?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/171509375