OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
169849190 5 months ago

DWG here. I was about to revert the previous changeset that moved the border. While I know of the conflict, I'm not knowledgeable of the details. Is this an actual disputed area or should it be reverted back to the previous state?

169698561 5 months ago

Looks like you added a waterway=drain to the building. Fortunately someone else removed it.

Also, when adding trees, sometimes it is easier to draw a polygon around a group of trees and tag it as natural=wood.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169698561

169689339 5 months ago

#TIP: when a drive through goes under a roof, I usually separate the roof section from the building, then add layer=1 to the building=roof.

The rest of your edits looks great.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169689339

169675965 5 months ago

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169675965

169745915 5 months ago

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169745915

125997128 5 months ago

Do you know if this region is still under dispute between Chile and Argentina? DWG received a report that it has been resolved but with no documentation that it has.

169536701 5 months ago

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169536701

169536636 5 months ago

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169536636

169533047 5 months ago

#TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q" - they will look very professionally done
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169533047

169485230 5 months ago

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169485230

169474612 5 months ago

#TIP: Descriptive names are not used in OSM. Instead, just tagging the feature is sufficient.

Also, from the aerial imagery, this looks like a highway=footpath instead of a path. A path is more like a trail.

Can you review this edit?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169474612

169484707 5 months ago

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169484707

169427509 5 months ago

Do you know if OSM is allowed to use Ferndale's imagery? I'm in Skagit county and know that the imagery can not be used in OSM.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169427509

169422235 5 months ago

This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169422235

169422235 5 months ago

The node should be placed where the device is located not on the intersection. Because of the location I removed it.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169422235

169257314 5 months ago

#TIP: driveways are always considered as private so the access=private is not needed with the exception when the driveway is posted as no tresspassing.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169257314

169222030 5 months ago

I'm unable to open the link, just get a bad gateway error.

169222030 5 months ago

VWorld의 이미지를 사용하지 마십시오. 제 이해로는 한국의 이용 약관이 OSM에서 해당 이미지를 사용하지 못하도록 규정하고 있습니다.

현재 해당 약관을 조사 중이며, 만약 예상대로라면 이 이미지를 사용한 편집 내용은 되돌려야 할 수 있습니다.

in English:
Please do not use VWorld's imagery since it is my understanding, Korea's terms of use do not allow it to be used in OSM.

We are doing an investigation of the terms and if it is as we suspect, then you edits that used this imagery will need to be reverted.

169040707 5 months ago

Thanks for getting back to me. I know this is a big issue since the state and counties are still discussing motorized vehicles on trails now that we have electric bikes. BTW - did you know we have a tag dirtbike:scale to define the difficulty of the trail? See dirtbike:scale=*

169040707 5 months ago

Your edit allows motor vehicles on trails. Trails by definition in OSM are not suitable for cars or trucks. Please review this edit. Let me know if you need help. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169040707