That PDF was interesting. When looking at the cities database from the county - there was nothing for Quil Ceda Village. Could be because it's part of the tribe. Thanks for adding it.

Where did you get the boundary information for Quil Ceda Village? I can not find it in Snohomish County GIS records.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157273471

#TIP - add the gate to the track to let everyone know where it is. add barrier=gate.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157017985

Thanks for the quick reply. I don't have any problems with single property driveways being tagged as private, but roads such as Cinarron Lane and Sedona Lane serve multiple houses. The wiki at access=* says private is defined as "General public access is not allowed. Access is granted with individual permission only. Examples: A driveway with a no trespassing or keep out sign; A company parking lot for employees only." It specifies that there should be a no trespassing or keep out signage.

BTW - I live in Mount Vernon nearby a number of private roads, none are posted, and lots of people drive on the roads.

I'll leave it up to you to remove the access tag or not. Just be aware that other users could easily remove it.

On a side topic - I'm impressed with your goal to ride on every road in the area.

These are privately maintained roads but as far as I know not marked with no trespassing which would warrant the access=private tag. I think you want the tag ownership=private. Can you please review your changesets that marked roads as access=private?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156712501

Thanks for removing the motorway
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156667669

This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

I'm not aware of any motorway between these two points. I see you removed them in a subsequent changeset. Very good.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156667655

Reverted this changeset. Glassman from DWG

We can not use google street view to add features to OSM. Please remove these features with source geometry of google street view. Glassman - DWG

Reverted changesets and block user

There is no wikipedia artlcle Fairleigh. Where did you get this info?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155992071

There is no city of Rainier Vista as far as I'm aware. Can you confirm the city or revert the changeset?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156042221

Also - not a ford - looks like a bridge. A ford is where the road and stream cross each other. https://gis3.richmondnc.com/portal/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=bd707a450ca7445a8456e1db6a97818c
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155992494

The county shows this as Battley Dairy Road. Where did you get the Fairleigh Home Road
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155992494

All I see is nodes - no line strings/ways tagged as roads. Could you review this import?

Please leave a brief descriptive changeset comment, such as added school. Factic situation on all of your changeseets doesn't help anyone.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/155928243

The DWG received a message that 342 Duffield Road Derby DE22 1ER should be the southern most of the two semi-detached houses. Could you look this over?

Thanks for fixing the right bridge. And you can see why I didn't want to be the one to close the wrong bridge.

I noticed you updated the tags on Rainy River Rail Lift bridge. Did you know that the bridge collapsed? See https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/rail-bridge-collapses-us-canada-border-112898270. Are you familiar with the bridge or just updating rail tags? Be good if someone familiar with it could map it as closed.

Thanks for getting back. BC Archaeology was asking about Asking Rock, node/6761055180. The node was updated by another user to update the tags. I will advise BC Archaeology that the site is signed.