This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151697998

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151697873

#TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q" - they will much nicer.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151696729

Can you review this and other changesets that added cycleway and change them to either path or track if you agree?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151694796

I don't think you want cycleway. Cycleways are typically found in cities, paved next to a street. Either path or track seems more appropriate. See osm.wiki/Mountain_biking
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151694796

Fixed

#TIP: we spell out street names in OSM the reason is that software has a hard time unabbreviating.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151652644

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151652495

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151647691

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151645832

We don't use descriptive names. landuse=recreation_ground is sufficient. Although this looks like a parking area to me. If so tag it as amenity=parking.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151651060

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151642688

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151642557

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151642512

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151642431

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151642370

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151642166

Roads are added as ways on polygons. (Technically, roads can be added as polygons but then routing and other such features won't work.) Also, we don't really have living streets in the US. I changed it to a service road.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151642295

This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151642295

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/151642166