Glassman's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 136189740 | over 2 years ago | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. I removed the duplicate buildings. To update a existing object, just modify the existing tags.
|
| 136178489 | over 2 years ago | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. A tag is needed to define Pat's Prairie area. I'm happy to help if you can tell me what type of area this is. It looks like possible wetlands but i'm not sure.
|
| 136179689 | over 2 years ago | A couple of points. First Gabby's Java could be drawn as a building with information about the coffee shop within. The other areas look like parking but I'm not sure from the imagery. Can you look at Gabby's again? Second, Sunny Farms looks like it already tagged. I would recommend removing your node since the existing one has complete information. See way/572091845
|
| 136056237 | over 2 years ago | Thanks for the information. I've changed the road to a service road and marked it as private. Having it tagged as a tertiary wasn't good either - that would make it a higher priority for routers to use. |
| 136056237 | over 2 years ago | I haven't head back from you so I removed the private tag from motor vehicles. Please let me know if this is incorrect.
|
| 136070803 | over 2 years ago | What makes West 38th Avenue private that would prevent routers from taking people to their house? Is there a gate that can't be seen on the imager or is it posted no trespassing? |
| 136056237 | over 2 years ago | why is Cougar Smith Road tagged as private for motor vehicles?
|
| 135914874 | over 2 years ago | Check out the wiki amenity=parking_space for mapping individual parking spaces. You would still need a highway=service for vehicle routing. (Telsa auto drive feature apparently you can summons your car to pick you up. But it needs well mapped parking lots including curbs and such. It looked like the access key was added by the park. It is easy to overlook. I try to map the footway=access_aisle to connect the sidewalk system to the marked area next to the handicap parking. |
| 135914874 | over 2 years ago | I'm curious why you remove the service roads in the parking lot? Typically these are mapped.
|
| 135914848 | over 2 years ago | That is a big house. It would be better to follow the roof line when adding a building. Can you review this edit?
|
| 135914692 | over 2 years ago | Adding access=no is confusing. bikes, horses and people on foot are allowed. Normally a footway is restricted to people and sometime bikes. motor vehicles are not allowed. Can you review the access tag on this edit?
|
| 135914618 | over 2 years ago | Removing the amenity=school takes away the tag describing the building or area. Ideally amenity=school is often used for the landuse area the school takes up, it can be just on the building. Can you review this edit and add amenity=school back? See amenity=school
|
| 135790734 | over 2 years ago | #TIP: we don't use descriptive names. The tag should be sufficient. BTW - because OSM was started in England we use British English and English terms for roads, buildings, etc. A footway is like a sidewalk in the US - it can be paved or not. a path is more like a trail.
|
| 135722400 | over 2 years ago | Is Evergreen Way also WA 14? If so the ref tag should remain. You can read more about ref tags at ref=*
|
| 135714815 | over 2 years ago | #TIP: under the background layer you can often find new imagery than the default. I used NAIP to better map the house at 2431. also - OSM got it start in England so we use British English and their road classifications. A unclassified road is basically a rural residential road. What I think you wanted is highway=service + service=driveway. I went ahead and made the change.
|
| 135674487 | over 2 years ago | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. The road exists and can be added to OSM. If the service road, I assume the county doesn't maintain it, is posted or has a gate, then access=no is appropriate. OSM does want to protect the privacy of people. We don't allow individual names unless they are signed with the name. But anyone can map features that are visible. I'm going to add the road back as a service road leaving the access=no.
|
| 135640405 | over 2 years ago | #TIP: instead of removing and re-adding features, just merge/and or update the existing tags. That save the history of the object. Also - square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
|
| 135684687 | over 2 years ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
| 135684564 | over 2 years ago | The building you created from the landuse is quite big and there are four buildings there. I changed it back to landuse=residential.
|
| 135679568 | over 2 years ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|