Glassman's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 128054251 | about 3 years ago | Removing the building=yes implies that this isn't a building but it clearly looks like one. Can you review?
|
| 128053623 | about 3 years ago | Can you verify that this house is a cafe? It looks just like the rest of the residential houses. Usually cities limit zoning in residential neighborhoods.
|
| 127815369 | about 3 years ago | I didn't hear back from you so I reverted your edit. Please let me know if you think this is wrong.
|
| 127857970 | about 3 years ago | #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q". Also - in the editor, the background layer may have more recent imagery of the area. For example Maxar Premium imagery is more current but still missing a number of the houses. You can also use King County imagery. Let me know if you need help adding it to the editor.
|
| 127822505 | about 3 years ago | #TIP: opening hours are entered as Mo-Fr 08:00-17:00. Can you fix your opening hours you entered on this and the other business you added? Thanks
|
| 127822643 | about 3 years ago | It looks like the address node was dragged. Can you review this edit?
|
| 127822108 | about 3 years ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
| 127824350 | about 3 years ago | #TIP: instead of deleting the node when removing a business, leave the address. The county will likely reuse the address.
|
| 127818812 | about 3 years ago | It looks like you added a second landuse polygon inside of an existing landuse polygon. Since a new Amazon facility is being built there I removed your landuse polygon. #TIP: Other background imagery may be more current than Bing. For example Esri World Imagery shows the construction of the Amazon warehouse.
|
| 127817118 | about 3 years ago | You removed the underground cable across lake washington. Was that in error?
|
| 127815369 | about 3 years ago | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
|
| 127815369 | about 3 years ago | These features seem make believe. Only features that can be verified should be added to OSM. Please let me know if these are real objects.
|
| 127814848 | about 3 years ago | Some of the building outlines seem to be over empty land. Can you confirm that a structure exists?
|
| 127813115 | about 3 years ago | #TIP: The building outline should match the imagery and not the whole parcel. Can you review this edit?
|
| 127813094 | about 3 years ago | #TIP: We spell out street names in OSM. The reason is that routers have a hard time unabbreviating.
|
| 127812718 | about 3 years ago | #TIP: We don't use descriptive names in OSM. For example instead of name=Pasture, just tag it as landuse=meadow + meadow=pasture. Can you review this edit and remove the descriptive names?
|
| 127814763 | about 3 years ago | #TIP: Square building by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
|
| 127805832 | about 3 years ago | I'm confused by the walking bridge. You added the footway with a bridge and also a polygon as a bridge. Normally we only add the bridge tag to the footway. Also, you connected the footway to the stream. I'm guessing they don't actually intersect. Nor does the footway connect to any other feature. Can you review this edit?
|
| 127803231 | about 3 years ago | When adding a business to a building containing a number of businesses, draw the outline of the building then place a node for each individual business.
|
| 127802868 | about 3 years ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|