OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
119595753 almost 4 years ago

Question - is the entire beach part of the shoreline restoration area? If so, the tag should be on the area. Also we don't use descriptive names. I'd add access=no to the area and tag it as boundary=protective_area. See boundary=protected_area for the various types of classifications. Let me know if you need any help.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119595753

119553228 almost 4 years ago

#TIP: OSM spells out street name - ie. no abbreviations. The reason is that software has a hard time unabbreviating. Can you update 9th Street Northeast (assuming that's correct)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119553228

119517153 almost 4 years ago

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

#TIP: Turn restrictions aren't needed to prevent wrong way turns onto oneway streets. They don't harm anything either.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119517153

119518356 almost 4 years ago

Thanks!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119518356

119449853 almost 4 years ago

I went ahead and added the woods back. Only the tags were removed.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119449853

119449800 almost 4 years ago

The county doesn't recognise the road. I would leave it as a highway=service, service=driveway. Also - I only add access=private if the driveway is posted keep out or no trespassing.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119449800

119449764 almost 4 years ago

#TIP: We don't use descriptive names in OSM. the tag tourism=guest_house is sufficient.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119449764

119449743 almost 4 years ago

#TIP: Street names are not abbreviated in OSM - reason - software has a hard time unabbreviating. Can you fix Butternut Rd?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119449743

119489497 almost 4 years ago

Mariposa Park is inside of the Barbara McClintock STEM school. Normally they would be drawn as adjacent features. Can you review this edit?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119489497

119448316 almost 4 years ago

#TIP: When sidewalks go under roofs - I just disconnect the roof section, tag it as building=roof and layer=1. There is also a covered tag for sidewalks but this looked like a roof.

Also - The building is tagged as a church - can you add the denomination?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119448316

119446924 almost 4 years ago

#TIP: Try not to connect features like parks to roads. Making changes to either is much more difficult with the nodes connected. And I know the OSM editor is just trying to help ;)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119446924

119438613 almost 4 years ago

#TIP: We don't add addresses to streets or sidewalks. Can you move it to the middle of the building?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119438613

119438589 almost 4 years ago

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119438589

119428479 almost 4 years ago

#TIP: We don't use descriptive names in OSM. The tag amenity=fountain is sufficient. If the fountain is actually named Decorative fountain - then great job. Otherwise can you review this edit?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119428479

119407014 almost 4 years ago

This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

You moved the pharmacy to a parking lot and changed the name of the street. I'm going to fix your edit but please be more careful in the future.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119407014

119403543 almost 4 years ago

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119403543

119402928 almost 4 years ago

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119402928

119209384 almost 4 years ago

This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

These objects don't match the imagery. Please review your edit and fix.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119209384

119210221 almost 4 years ago

This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

You have overlapping buildings. Also imagery shows multiple building by you drew one large building.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119210221

119208886 almost 4 years ago

Please respond to user_5359 questions - otherwise the edit will likely be removed. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119208886