If the trails exist they will likely be added back by another mapper. Instead of deleting them, it's better to add the tag access=no (or whatever is appropriate.) access=no will prevent routers from suggesting the trail.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117413604

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117396205

#TIP: When creating an object inside of another - the grass area inside of the parking lot, it needs to be part of a multipolygon. Not a bit intuitive to create. I went ahead and made the change.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117378312

A new mapper just deleted the trails you added claiming they are on private land. If the trails exist and are being used, then they likely should be in OSM. Are these trails open to the public? See https://osmcha.org/changesets/117413604/ for the removal of the trails

Your changeset comment said adding a public walkway through the building but then added access=no which would prevent people from using the walkway. Can you review this edit?

Also check out tunnel=building_passage. Is that what you wanted to add?

#TIP: Typically name should be with leading capitals instead of all caps.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117341991

Thank you for your edit. However - it appears the stream is headed away from the Columbia River. I would have guessed that it would flow into the Columbia River. Check out https://apps.nationalmap.gov/ for the NHD. Can you review this edit?
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117307139

#TIP: pick either pond or lake for the water tag.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117306897

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117306892

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

One suggestion - The road and the lake shouldn't be connected.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117306874

#TIP: Unless the water body is good size, I just leave them as water=pond since there is no real definition of what a lake is. Can you review this edit?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117306930

#TIP: The building outline already had the church name - the name in the node is not needed. Can you fix?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117307113

#TIP: In addition to the name, it is good to add a tag to describe the feature, in this case leisure=park. Can you update your edit? Let me know if you need help
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117268303

This house seem like an unlikely place to be named the NW Symphony Orchestra. Can you confirm the name?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117286126

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. If you need to make a change, just go back and add in any missing features. For example, if the restrooms exist, just add them back. Let me know if you need help. I'll send you more info in a message.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117140768

#TIP: You actually had the street correct in the previous edit. OSM spells out street names - the reason is software has a hard time unabbreviating.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117109263

I'm not sure what you were trying to accomplish but Bothell was downgraded from a city and the wikipedia/wikidata tags were removed. I've reverted the changeset. Feel free to reachout if you need help.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117081914

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

#TIP: Save and upload your edits before moving to another location.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117069946

One of the goals of the import guidelines is to insure that the imported data is licensed appropriately to be brought into OSM. According to Jefferson County, the address points are licensed as cc by 4.0 which is incompatible with OSM's ODbL license. Ideally the data should be CC0 (public domain.) A work around is to get permission from the county for the data to be imported into OSM. That basically entails documenting email from the county on the wiki.

The actual data brought in looks great and is much needed. We just need to make sure that it meets the communities guidelines.

#TIP: OSM spells out street names - the reason - software has a hard time unabbreviating. Can you fixt the address street name?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116993442