Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

#TIP: It's often that the imagery is offset. Imagery can be adjusted under the background icon on the right side of the editor.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108454074

#TIP: From the imagery it looks like a trail rather than a footway. OSM uses British English and terms since OSM was started in England. highway=footway is what we'd call a sidewalk. highway=path could also be called a trail.

If you find existing mapping that needs fixing, don't be afraid to make a change.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108390064

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108372566

#TIP: Often if the building appears offset, you can just adjust the imagery offset. In the editor, the offset adjustment is located in the background layer which is on the right hand side of the editor.

I'll send you some general info on OSM in a message. In there is a link to Learnosm.org which I believe covers this topic.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108338251

Thanks for the info. NHD stands for the USGS National Hydrography Dataset. Now that you pointed it out, it does seem strange that the north fork 35 mile creek would meet up with the 25 mile creek. I'm going to ask a friend that works for WA

Ecology to see if he can get USGS to fix the name.

The person who added the stream has a great reputation and a background from working for the State. That's the main reason I even asked.

NHD can be found at https://www.usgs.gov/core-science-systems/ngp/national-hydrography/national-hydrography-dataset?qt-science_support_page_related_con=0#qt-science_support_page_related_con

According to NHD the creek is name North Fork Thirty-five Mile Creek. Where did you get the other name from? Are their signs with the creeks name?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108143571

Instead of removing the path, add access=private. That way the path is known to search and rescue organizations. Can you fix?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108175441

Thanks for adding all the addresses and building names! They look great!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108067013

Thanks for correcting.

The footway should connect to the service road - they do in real life. Can you fix this edit?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107917796

Can you verify the location? King County Parcel data shows this area as vacant. There is a donut shop just east on NW Gilman Blvd across 12 Ave NW.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107800163

I noticed you added some neighborhoods in Bellingham. I believe they need the tag admin_level=10. See boundary=administrative. You'll need to scroll way down to see the US admin levels. You might also look at relation/5277068 how one of the neighborhoods of Seattle was mapped.

The sign makes it pretty conclusive that it's mapped correctly. Thanks for getting back to me.

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. Question - According to city, this area is part of the West Bellevue Neighborhood with no mention of Meydenbauer Point. Should this area be called Meydenbauer Point?
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107797543

The location of the coffee shop appears to be on the sidewalk. Can you adjust the node to the correct location? I'm guessing it's the building just to the east.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107733606

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. Nicely drawn apartment buildings. The look awesome.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107728492

Thanks

#TIP: we typically don't use descriptive names. Also, it looks like you attempted to draw the house at 2350 75th Ave W twice. I see someone already corrected it.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107638043

#TIP: I typically don't use access=no or access=private on driveways. They are by nature access=destination so an access tag isn't really required. I do add access=no when there is a no trespassing sign.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107580967

#TIP: alleys are tagged as highway=service + service=alley. We don't use descriptive names, like name=alley. I went ahead and fixed this edit.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107580860