Glassman's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 96469109 | about 5 years ago | I may be reading the wiki wrong, but I don't see it saying that we can't name neighborhoods. Especially if its well understood by the residents. I'm not familiar with Lynden but in Seattle the city has shapefile boundaries of their neighborhoods.
|
| 95421158 | about 5 years ago | Thanks for the clarification. For some background. This changeset was from AI identified roads with little human investigation of what was being added resulting in a complete revert of this and many more similar edits by the mapper. In this area local mappers seem to basically agree that unclassified is either a rural residential road or an open logging road maintained by some governmental agency. The former fits well with what I understand is the British use of unclassified. (And it certainly doesn't mean not classified although it should.) Logging roads typically have barriers, although most are not mapped, and are not suitable for the average car, especially after a few years go by after they were created during a clear cut project. |
| 96281971 | about 5 years ago | Looking at Bing imagery which OSM can legally use, https://www.bing.com/maps?toWww=1&redig=4A827C653A9D480E80AB513B46B43DA8 It appears that there is a gate just before the bridge. If that true - it would be good to add. If this is just for horses, where is the driveway to the house?
|
| 96278512 | about 5 years ago | I went ahead and move the golf course boundary to the north side of the highway since it likely doesn't extend that far. Also removed the highway area as it doesn't add any real value. Let me know if it looks okay to you. BTW - the golf courses look great!
|
| 95903753 | about 5 years ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
| 96225632 | about 5 years ago | I haven't had a chance to look at your edit, but noticed that you are adding a lot of transit routes around the country. Are you working for a company associated with OTP?
|
| 96144827 | about 5 years ago | Looks like you missed the culvert under 6th Avenue West. Can you add it? The other culverts you added look good.
|
| 95955047 | about 5 years ago | Thanks for adding the sidewalks. If you are interested in adding more detail to the sidewalks by adding in crosswalks and curb cuts, check out my blog https://www.snowandsnow.us/articles/Mapping-Sidewalks-iD/
|
| 95898380 | about 5 years ago | From the imagery landuse=retail looks more like a building. Can you change it to building-retail? Let me know if you need help.
|
| 95899187 | about 5 years ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
| 95897926 | about 5 years ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
| 95897646 | about 5 years ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
| 95710968 | about 5 years ago | Do you need help adding the culvert?
|
| 95710951 | about 5 years ago | You mentioned a bridge but there doesn't appear to be one. Do you need help adding it?
|
| 95705030 | about 5 years ago | Tip: often the imagery is offset. Adjust the offset using the background layers icon on the right hand side of the editor. The offset adjustment is at the botton of the list of imagery.
|
| 95638232 | about 5 years ago | The editor tries to help but can get in the way at times. Access=no means the footway is there but should not be used. Access=all is the default. But you can add in restrictions for instance horse=no. I made a change to the tags that hopefully are correct. Since paths/sidewalks can't be seen from the imagery you could take a gps traces and add in the new route. |
| 95640206 | about 5 years ago | Did you know there is an android app, StreetComplete that has challenges to add in speed limits to streets.
|
| 95639950 | about 5 years ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
| 95639910 | about 5 years ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
| 95639711 | about 5 years ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|