Glassman's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 92191102 | about 5 years ago | Can you check the location of the trailhead? It appears to be in a restricted area. Shelton View Forest is to the west of this location. Trailheads should be a node on the actual trail and tagged has highway=trailhead. See highway=trailhead
|
| 92158450 | about 5 years ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
| 92157753 | about 5 years ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
| 92135965 | about 5 years ago | Tip: We spell out streetname fully in OSM. The reason is software has a hard time unabbreviating words.
|
| 92131925 | about 5 years ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
| 92001517 | about 5 years ago | Yes the razed tag doesn't conflict with the new usage. I believed the Burke Gillman trail is tagged like that, although I haven't looked at it in a while. |
| 92073859 | about 5 years ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it look good.
|
| 92073745 | about 5 years ago | It looks like you have a parking lot inside of another parking lot. It might be best to remove the large one and then add in the smaller one. Can you fix it?
|
| 92073714 | about 5 years ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it look good.
|
| 92073613 | about 5 years ago | Tip: it looks like you accidentally deleted the highway type on 87th ave. It has been fixed
|
| 92129070 | about 5 years ago | Thanks for fixing the street names
|
| 92128751 | about 5 years ago | Tip: The US really doesn't have living streets as defined in the OSM wiki. If it is a residential street then it should be tagged as highway=residential.
|
| 92128576 | about 5 years ago | Tip: OSM uses street names fully spelled out. The reason is software has a hard time unabbreviating. can you fix 187th Ave. SE?
|
| 92128554 | about 5 years ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
| 92080231 | about 5 years ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
| 92076740 | about 5 years ago | the point seems redundant. The area is mapped as a park. Is that correct? I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
|
| 92073847 | about 5 years ago | Looking at the aerial imagery I don't see any indication of any housing. Can you verify?
|
| 92072887 | about 5 years ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it look good.
|
| 92072968 | about 5 years ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it look good.
|
| 92067067 | about 5 years ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it look good.
|