OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
88382669 over 5 years ago

Not sure how you did it, but it looks like the house was created with two separate ways instead of an area. It kind of works in OSM. I merged the segments using JOSM to created a polygon building and aligned it to the image. About the only way to fix it with the browser editor, iD, is to delete it and redraw it. Let me know if you have any questions.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88382669

88382720 over 5 years ago

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it look good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88382720

88375920 over 5 years ago

Tip: roof peaks are usually straight, but when the satellite is not directly overhead, they appear as if there is a peak.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88375920

88370305 over 5 years ago

Thanks for updating the street name
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88370305

88313596 over 5 years ago

We don't add names to features unless it can be verified by other mappers.

Tip: Square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88313596

88315973 over 5 years ago

TIP: Change the change set comment when doing new edits.

Tip: Try to match the roof outline of the building. To square the building, select the outline then just type a "q"
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88315973

88257506 over 5 years ago

I moved the brew pub to the south and made Friesenburgers a node inside of the building so it doesn't appear that the two share the same space. I also removed the hair dresser since it shared the same address as the brewpub.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88257506

88201048 over 5 years ago

Is the parking really named Moon Date?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88201048

88187000 over 5 years ago

Not sure exactly what you want to accomplish. The tail can be tagged abandoned:highway=path. That might keep people from seeing it. Or you could just remove it. It was originally added by Natfoot. He is an active mapper in Washington State. You can also send him a message asking his opinion. @Natfoot to bring up his page to send a message.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88187000

88160295 over 5 years ago

TIP: select the building outline then just type a "q" to square it.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88160295

88162562 over 5 years ago

Tip: when removing buildings - copy the addr: tags to a point to save for later use.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88162562

88038193 over 5 years ago

Sorry - I may not have made myself clear. I agree that the tags you removed needed to be removed. I was just suggesting to also remove the other wrong tags. The original editor should have just tagged it as a pedestrian crossing node where the crossing and road intersected. Instead they tagged it as if it was the kerb.

88038193 over 5 years ago

Probably should remove the kerb=lowered and tactile_paving=yes. I'm guessing they don't exist in the middle of the road.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88038193

88000082 over 5 years ago

FYI - the campsite already existed. I merged the two nodes since yours also include a website.

87997170 over 5 years ago

Wow!

One suggestion, I believe the mural is on the building. I might be more appropriate to move the node to the building outline near where the mural is actually located. Let me know if you need help.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87997170

87950164 over 5 years ago

TIP: A footway would be the equivalent of a sidewalk. I think you mean path which we also call a trail. OSM uses British English for tag names since OSM was started in the UK. Can you update the trail to highway=path?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87950164

87896795 over 5 years ago

One problem with routers is that they don't refresh OSM data all that often. Some of the good ones do about once a week. Others who knows. Since it was already tagged as access no when you edited it, I would report it to a router. Graphhopper is pretty good about fixing their routing problems. I worked with them on ferry durations.

87896795 over 5 years ago

TIP: the access=no should be sufficient to prevent routers from using the trail. You can improve it by placing a node where the fence is located with a tag barrier=fence.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87896795

87928599 over 5 years ago

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it look good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87928599

87927477 over 5 years ago

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it look good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87927477