Glassman's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 86032035 | over 5 years ago | Please don't vandalize OSM. Volunteers work hard to make a great map that is free to everyone.
|
| 86017235 | over 5 years ago | Thanks for the updates. I've worked with the State Parks and Rec department to get the boundaries correct. I'm glad you didn't take what is also call a social trail, illegal is a better name. As long as the tail exist someone will try to add it back. When the trail no longer exists then it should be removed from OSM.
I'll send you more information on OSM in a message.
|
| 85982410 | over 5 years ago | I added the wikidata item back. Did you remove it by mistake?
|
| 85960349 | over 5 years ago | Tip: When editing upload your work before moving to another area to work. Also - I'm not sure why bell street in Edmonds was removed and added back. I reverted it to help keep the history. I'll send you some info on OSM to help you get started.
|
| 85958456 | over 5 years ago | TIP: Square building by selecting the outline, then just type an "q"
|
| 85811288 | over 5 years ago | We get caught in a trap because OSM, founded in England, uses British English. Condo is apparently associated with short term rentals like a long term stay hotel/motel. The only real two choices are building=apartments or building=residential. BTW - I will ask the developer why searching on condo brings up the tourism tag. That doesn't seem right to me. I'll ask on Slack #dev channel if you are interested. Join at slack.openstreetmap.us |
| 85811288 | over 5 years ago | I don't believe we have a tag tourism=apartment. Can you fix the tag on the apartment building you modified?
|
| 85781244 | over 5 years ago | Please don't spam OSM.
|
| 85778385 | over 5 years ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it look good.
|
| 85671017 | over 5 years ago | paths, streets, sidewalks are usually added as a way (line). OSM does have pedestrian ways, like UW's Red Square, but these are unusual. By adding a path as a way it can be routed on, although I suspect no one needs a router to find their way around a golf course.
|
| 85632738 | over 5 years ago | A better way would be to change to building=apartments. Can you make the change?
|
| 85521626 | over 5 years ago | How do people get to their homes on the east side of the Burke Gillman trail if the road doesn't exist?
|
| 84723045 | over 5 years ago | I reverted your edit. Only verifiable features should be mapped.
|
| 85402583 | over 5 years ago | Nice addition.
|
| 84723045 | over 5 years ago | Since you made the edit, you should be the one to correct the tags. |
| 85284477 | over 5 years ago | This looks like a driveway instead of a residential road. it's not in the counties list of maintained roads either. I went ahead and changed the classification to a driveway and added access=private. I'd recommend adding a address point at the house to help routers find it.
|
| 85274188 | over 5 years ago | TIP: Did you know that you can square the building by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
|
| 85138218 | over 5 years ago | TIP: Same as last edit. This time, just extend the existing footpath after adjusting to fit the imagery. By not removing you preserve the history of an object.
|
| 85136255 | over 5 years ago | Tip: Instead of deleting a node, after drawing the polygon area, select both then right click to merge the features.
|
| 85049353 | over 5 years ago | If the shop is closed, then the name should be removed as well.
|