Tip: The building outline should match the image. Also, square the building by selecting the outline then just type a "q" Can you redo the building you did?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83048515

Routing software requires a means of getting from one side to the other, especially for wheelchair users. If you look at the intersection there are curb cuts on both sides of the street. Rolling curbs are not suitable for wheelchair users unless they are in great shape. The "gutter" portion of the rolling curb can trap the wheelchair users. If the curb cuts are there, can you add the crossing back?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82956517

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it look good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82956716

We don't actually have zebra crossings in the US. They are typically found in the UK. Since OSM was founded in the UK, we've been using their terminology. But since zebra crossings have specifics that aren't found here, we used marked or unmarked.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82956786

You do know that this golf course is closed and will not re-open.

Also - please don't delete features and then redraw them. Doing so loses all history of the objects.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82897728

Tip: Map each tee box as a separate area with the appropriate name for each. More info can be found at leisure=golf_course
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82798599

I like this changeset comment much better. Short but tells exactly what you did.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82771212

One suggestion for mapping sidewalks. Street crossings are tagged with highway=footway + footway=crossing + crossing=marked/unmarked. I've written up instructions for mapping sidewalks with JOSM, one of our other editors. https://www.snowandsnow.us/articles/Mapping-Sidewalks/
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82769953

Tip: Instead of removing the existing house, just update the geometry to save the history and also in this case the address. Which I noticed was wrong. I've added the correct address back to your newer bldg outline.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82763266

If you want to go back to square all of the building, just use the link https://osmcha.org/changesets/82736910?filters=%7B%22users%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22Lil-Stevie%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22Lil-Stevie%22%7D%5D%2C%22date__gte%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22%22%7D%5D%7D
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82736910

You can improve the building by squaring the outline. Just select the outline, then type a "q"
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82736627

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it look good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82731921

way/784371047 is actually going through a newer development that is shown on the ESRI World Imagery. You can't always trust the facebook ML streets. It comes from fairly old imagery. This area has lots of new development. I removed it as I was adding in sidewalks.

Don't forget to move the stream to tunnel=culvert + layer=-1 when the road crosses a stream. I went ahead and made the corrections.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82651986

I made some updates to your edit. The curb node should be at the approximate location of the actual curb (BTW kerb is British English which is used by OSM since it was founded in England.) I removed the duplicate section of the cycleway to the street by adding it to the existing crossing way. I'll send you some general info on OSM in a message. If my changes are not correct, please let me know.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82592063

OSM does not have restrictions on publishing trails. The access= tag should be added to identify who can have access. Mapping trails is useful for emergency response teams looking for lost or injured people or during wildfires.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82530438

OSM does not have restrictions on publishing trails. The access= tag should be added to identify who can have access. Mapping trails is useful for emergency response teams looking for lost or injured people or during wildfires.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82530264

A couple of the driveways crossed streams. I've added tunnel=culvert + layer=-1 to the driveways.

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it look good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82327514

We don't use descriptive names Private Property No Access} in OSM. I looks like someone removed the paths. I should caution you that anyone can edit OSM to add the paths back in. Tagging them as you did, access=private will prevent routers from using the path. However, it's useful for emergency services to see all paths and trails in an area, marked with the appropriate access tag.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82321452