Glassman's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 173109136 | 2 months ago | #TIP: flock devices should not be connected to ways, like sidewalks. I usually look for a poles shadow when adding things like this. I went ahead and unglued the device.
|
| 15928950 | 2 months ago | Hey, pnorman, do you recall why you atted the not:name to 169th Street NE? According to the county it is a short 169th Pl NE that is connected to 169th St NE. I would normally change it, but it's rare to see not:name tag. |
| 173070480 | 2 months ago | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found. Reverted for fake feature
|
| 173068501 | 2 months ago | FYI, if you switch to the ESRI World imagery, you can see one completed house and the construction of another. Just select the background icon in the editor and select the ESRI World imagery.
|
| 173026793 | 2 months ago | #TIP: When adding address, the names are spelled out, for example, 1st Avenue South. The reason is that software has a hard time unabbreviating.
|
| 173023532 | 2 months ago | #TIP: What you might be seeing is the imagery offset has changed since this was first maped. To adjust the offset, select the background icon in the editor, the towards the bottom, move the imagery to match to the existing background
|
| 173037277 | 2 months ago | Thanks for adding all of the sidewalks. it one of my favoriate things to do. If you are interested in adding more detail, check out osm.wiki/Foundation/Local_Chapters/United_States/Pedestrian_Working_Group/Guide. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
|
| 172935045 | 3 months ago | Sorry, my mistake, I was looking at the OSM rendering which is the same as a deleted way in OSMCha.org. I appologize for misundersanding the rendering. Good luck mapping.
|
| 172936925 | 3 months ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
| 172935045 | 3 months ago | I appears you may have acidentially remove part of the PCT and access to trails from the parking lot. Can you fix this? Let me know if you need help
|
| 172884837 | 3 months ago | The road appears on the newest imagery, ESRI World, If the service road still exists, it would be better to add the tag access=no. That will keep people from adding it from imagery.
|
| 172854519 | 3 months ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
| 172854490 | 3 months ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
| 172854285 | 3 months ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
| 172854250 | 3 months ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
| 172847670 | 3 months ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
| 172835483 | 3 months ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
| 172852790 | 3 months ago | #TIP: try not to add the node to an existing feature. If the other feature changes shape in the future, ungluing objects is a pain
|
| 172848913 | 3 months ago | Sorry that I missed all of the nodes. I has reverting some vandalism, which had been touched but not removed. The nodes have since been removed |
| 172817009 | 3 months ago | Geometry has a interesting to represent objects inside of another. Check out mulipolygons. osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon. Basically you create a polygon (area) around the building and another around the parking lot. Then select both areas, right click, select the + to create a multipolygon. When in the editor, see help on relations.
|