Glassman's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 169849190 | 5 months ago | DWG here. I was about to revert the previous changeset that moved the border. While I know of the conflict, I'm not knowledgeable of the details. Is this an actual disputed area or should it be reverted back to the previous state? |
| 169698561 | 5 months ago | Looks like you added a waterway=drain to the building. Fortunately someone else removed it. Also, when adding trees, sometimes it is easier to draw a polygon around a group of trees and tag it as natural=wood.
|
| 169689339 | 5 months ago | #TIP: when a drive through goes under a roof, I usually separate the roof section from the building, then add layer=1 to the building=roof. The rest of your edits looks great.
|
| 169675965 | 5 months ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
| 169745915 | 5 months ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
| 125997128 | 5 months ago | Do you know if this region is still under dispute between Chile and Argentina? DWG received a report that it has been resolved but with no documentation that it has. |
| 169536701 | 5 months ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
| 169536636 | 5 months ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
| 169533047 | 5 months ago | #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q" - they will look very professionally done
|
| 169485230 | 5 months ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
| 169474612 | 5 months ago | #TIP: Descriptive names are not used in OSM. Instead, just tagging the feature is sufficient. Also, from the aerial imagery, this looks like a highway=footpath instead of a path. A path is more like a trail. Can you review this edit?
|
| 169484707 | 5 months ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
| 169427509 | 5 months ago | Do you know if OSM is allowed to use Ferndale's imagery? I'm in Skagit county and know that the imagery can not be used in OSM.
|
| 169422235 | 5 months ago | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
|
| 169422235 | 5 months ago | The node should be placed where the device is located not on the intersection. Because of the location I removed it.
|
| 169257314 | 5 months ago | #TIP: driveways are always considered as private so the access=private is not needed with the exception when the driveway is posted as no tresspassing.
|
| 169222030 | 5 months ago | I'm unable to open the link, just get a bad gateway error. |
| 169222030 | 5 months ago | VWorld의 이미지를 사용하지 마십시오. 제 이해로는 한국의 이용 약관이 OSM에서 해당 이미지를 사용하지 못하도록 규정하고 있습니다. 현재 해당 약관을 조사 중이며, 만약 예상대로라면 이 이미지를 사용한 편집 내용은 되돌려야 할 수 있습니다. in English:
We are doing an investigation of the terms and if it is as we suspect, then you edits that used this imagery will need to be reverted. |
| 169040707 | 5 months ago | Thanks for getting back to me. I know this is a big issue since the state and counties are still discussing motorized vehicles on trails now that we have electric bikes. BTW - did you know we have a tag dirtbike:scale to define the difficulty of the trail? See dirtbike:scale=* |
| 169040707 | 5 months ago | Your edit allows motor vehicles on trails. Trails by definition in OSM are not suitable for cars or trucks. Please review this edit. Let me know if you need help. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
|