OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
161008141 12 months ago

Please make sure the source you used isn't copyrighted and can not be used in OSM.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161008141

161007457 12 months ago

#TIP: when removing a business, also remove the associated tags, in this case soport=karting. But leave the address tags as they will likely be reused as you did in this case.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161007457

160968686 12 months ago

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160968686

160963382 12 months ago

#TIP: when removing a business, leave the address tags since they can be reused by the next business.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160963382

160935209 12 months ago

Great work adding in all the sidewalks.

Here is a couple of suggestions. A roof features needs the layer=1 tag so that service roads can go under the roof.

When you updated the name of the gas station, you removed the address. Those address are nice to have in OSM. Addresses are typically reused even when buildings are torn down.

Both the roof and addresses have been fixed. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160935209

160924487 12 months ago

#TIP: we spell out street names in OSM. The reason is that software has a hard time unabbreviating. Also the street you added in your other edit, should be a driveway as noted on county gis records. These have been fixed by another contributor. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160924487

160899856 12 months ago

This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

the majority of tags do not even come close to OSM standards. Reverting
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160899856

161027974 12 months ago

You changed landuse=residential to landuse=grass then in the next changeset you deleted all of the landuse areas. Can you add the landuse back? Let me know if you need help.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161027974

161027974 12 months ago

You changed landuse=residential to landuse=grass then in the next changeset you deleted all of the landuse areas. Can you add the lanuse back? Let me know if you need help.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161027974

161039486 12 months ago

I noticed you are adding farmland which is great, but typically farmland doesn't have a name, such as field 1. Also, farmland should only cover the crop area, and not the farm yard. Farm yards are tagged as landuse=farmyard.

The trees you mapped as landuse=forest, is likely just natural=wood. I fixed one of them.

I would strongly suggest you consult the wiki for example landuse=farmland. you might also want to join the OSM US Slack at osmus.slack.com where you can get help contributing to OSM.

160460033 12 months ago

OSM spells out street names. The reason is that software has a hard time unabbreviating.

Can you please restore the names of all the street you changed?

Thanks
Glassman

160380592 12 months ago

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

I see you changed the name in a subsequent edit. Thanks.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160380592

160892407 12 months ago

This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

please read the wiki on how to add your business to OSM. You might want to start with shop=computer. Also your address is the same as another business in the same building, including suite number.

I'm going to remove the non standard tags so hopefully you will add the correct ones.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160892407

160848919 12 months ago

The location is in a parking lot. Is the actual location just to the north in the Carrara building?

Also, is the office really open 24/7?

160838828 12 months ago

Thanks for the info and yes I'm aware of the wiki page. But can you explain why West Barlett Road was upgraded from residential to Tertiary? It doesn't have a shoulder and just has the default county speed limit. And that is just one example of my concern.

Can I suggest you discuss these edits on OSM US Slack #local_washington channel or on the OSM community forum at https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/us/ before making more changes?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160838828

160840727 12 months ago

Thanks - It possible that Bing image is older and the gate installed later.

160838828 12 months ago

Why all the road upgrading? For example looks like a residential or unclassified road according to OSM classification system. A tertiary is defined as one that links smaller towns and villages. Can you explain your reasoning?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160838828

160840727 12 months ago

Bing street side imagery doesn't show a gate. Where is it located?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160840727

155676132 12 months ago

The DWG received a request to remove the Taint trail for being very unsafe. Another user agreed that it is very unsafe. Since you added this trail, would you agree that it should be removed?

160804382 12 months ago

Looks like AwFi removed those tags. I may have to revisit the revert perl script to see why it doesn't remove everything. Thanks for the heads up.