Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150394812

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150380068

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150372053

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150312640

I have reverted all of your additions of the golf course. OSM is only for verifiable features.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150284719

This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150284719

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150248123

Reverted - added business to highway when it should have been a node inside of a building.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150235514

a driveway should just be a way not an area. I see someone remove it already.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150106897

highway=service is needed with service=parking_aisle. I added them back.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150106952

I think your first edit was better. The wiki recommends seamark:type=wreck. See osm.wiki/Seamarks/Wrecks

Please review this edit.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150476965

#TIP: instead of removing the node, just delete all but the address info which can be used when another business moves in.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/150016695

Interesting. Is it restricted to only PNNL vehicles? Private could mean that it's privately owned but not restricted. In which case the appropriate tag could be ownership=private. or more specifically ownership=DOE
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149929182

Why is this a private road? It looks like it belongs to the county.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149929182

If multiple facilities are in a building, just use a node for each feature inside the building. Let me know if you have any questions.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149805134

The building= tag is needed to describe the feature.
I would suggest tagging it as building=apartment and removing the landuse and residential tag.

Can you review this changeset? Thanks
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149806546

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149805317

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149805207

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149796169

#TIP: If that it actually a driveway, then it should be tagged as highway=service + service=driveway. highway=unclassified is basically a rural residential street. OSM was started in England so we use England's highway classification system. Takes some getting used to.

Thanks for removing the name. I'll send more info on OSM in a message
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149748557