Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146846640

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

One suggestion. Instead of using a description, tag the function of the building or business. For example The retirement home should be tagged as amenity=social_facility + social_facility=assisted_living.

See social_facility=* for more information.

Please update the tags on the retirement home and dentist. Let me know if you need help.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146773076

#TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146796780

I squared the building to better align with their roof. To square a building, select the outline, then just type a "q". Also the imagery appears offset. You can change the offset in the editor by using the background icon on the right side. The offset adjustment is located near the bottom.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146764796

This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

Please don't remove addresses unless they are wrong. If they are wrong, please correct them.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146727872

This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

Please don't remove addresses unless they are wrong. If they are wrong, please correct them.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146727872

This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

Please don't remove addresses unless they are wrong. If they are wrong, change it to the correct address. I'm going to add the address back.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146728057

This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

You removed the address. I'm going to add the address back.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146728663

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146728681

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146728701

This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

You removed the address which hasn't changed. I'm going to revert this changeset.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146729059

Please use a more descriptive changeset comment. #cwugeog along with a description of the change would be appreciated.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146731450

While it is okay to create new tags, it often better to find an existing one. In this case metaphysical_shop has never been used. shop=metaphysical has been used 7 time. I would suggest reviewing the edit to pick an more common tag. Let me know if you need help.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146731485

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146731512

This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.

I reverted this changeset. The building was already there.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146731418

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146728316

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146728201

Why did you remove the address? Was it incorrect?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146727872

Thanks for fixing the tag
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146693692

Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146694429