Glassman's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 142781084 | about 2 years ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
| 142770861 | about 2 years ago | Bowling is tagged as sport=10pin. OSM started in England so we use their terminology for tags. Also, you removed the building tag. I assume it is located in a building so I corrected it.
|
| 142742955 | about 2 years ago | When removing objects, it makes sense to leave the address since it's likely to be reused at a later date.
|
| 142739400 | about 2 years ago | The playground overlaps with the school Can you modify the playground to just include the playground area?
|
| 142739310 | about 2 years ago | Instead of adding a duplicate building, just add a node with the pro shop info. I made the change
|
| 142738874 | about 2 years ago | It looks good, but one suggestion, square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
|
| 142738464 | about 2 years ago | To use the recreation_ground tag, tag it as landuse=recreation_ground. See landuse=recreation_ground
|
| 142738269 | about 2 years ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
| 142737725 | about 2 years ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
| 142733473 | about 2 years ago | as far as I can tell, nothing was added, modified or deleted in this changeset.
|
| 142732652 | about 2 years ago | #TIP: to add a pedestrian way, just tag a line as highway=footway and for the section over the pond, just tag that as highway=footway + bridge=yes + level=1 Also, it is a friendly practice to modifying existing objects rather than deleting and redrawing them. That same the history of the object.
|
| 142744414 | about 2 years ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
| 142744134 | about 2 years ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
| 142744050 | about 2 years ago | We don't add buildings inside of other buildings. I removed the added building but left a node with the business info. Also, the addr:street didn't match the street. I fixed it.
|
| 142744050 | about 2 years ago | This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
|
| 142743650 | about 2 years ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
| 142743230 | about 2 years ago | again we don't use descriptive names. As an alternative you could tag it as demolished:building=yes
|
| 142742640 | about 2 years ago | #TIP: we don't use descriptive names in OSM. Just a tag describing the function of the object is needed. For example, building=chicken_coop or building=henhouse
|
| 142734782 | about 2 years ago | Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
|
| 142732397 | about 2 years ago | When a business is one of many in a building, just use a node for the information. I removed the duplicate building and left a node with the brewery info.
|