I did, sorry, saw the path wasn't connected to a road so thought I'd sort it, must've missed the noexit tag.
Thanks for fixing.

Hi, this will probably need to be reverted as you've dragged a couple of nodes - but could you please explain what you were trying to fix on the map? Is Bain Street only complete up to a certain point?

I've changed this from a highway=raceway, as that tag is for motorised tracks way/684027198

Hi, is this track and the driveway road to the north actually private? As there is Strava heatmap activity on these. way/1080730705

Thanks. Might be worth creating separate nodes instead of tagging the buildings with two housenumbers, as there is no address for "29, 31".

Hi, what is source=ScotLIS?

Hmm, not sure - that looks like one of my early changesets so I've obviously made a mistake! I've now removed it.

I extended this pipeline way/1074564189#map=16/56.0051/-3.5410 out into the Forth based on this image: https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/7032042 - I see you've added the marker posts, have I put it in the wrong location?

Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edit. Unfortunately the buildings you added were not the correct shape so I have redrawn them.
It would be great if you could add the house numbers, if you know them.

Hi, can you clarify what you mean by "small powerstation"? Is it something generating electricity?

This doesn't look like a playground on Bing, have you actually surveyed it? (guessing you haven't)

Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edits. I've removed the duplicate nodes that were added for the Scholar and Scott, as the buildings were already tagged with the hotel info.

I've added the name back to be consistent with the other top up taps

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=311849047286073 just shows a pavement without any shared use signs, unless it has been widened I can't imagine things have changed since then.

Does way/123888940/ actually have a cycle track on one side or is it just a footway (pavement)?

Hi, could you I suggest you update your method of tagging crossings such as this one? node/9352617209
If you want to add "pelican" then it should be tagged as crossing_ref=pelican instead, with crossing=traffic_signals.

Why have you changed way/428462927 to a path?

Don't think historic=manor is the correct tag for this...

looks like you've added the ref to an admin boundary?

Thanks but I don't think we need to mark it as an attraction.