There's a fingerpost at either end of this route which say "low tide route", is that not enough to get it named?

Erm, don't think you need to have each part of the court individually mapped...

It was this video I added it from - as well as changed it from a road to a cycleway: https://youtu.be/3vMDRXxfm4E?t=8

Hi, not sure if you are aware but the Bing imagery here is slightly out of alignment with existing features. Before you start aligning things here it's best to turn on the OSMUK Cadastral Parcels overlay and use a background offset of 1.5,-2.6, thanks.

Thanks for adding these. I typed in "pure" and PureGym came up for me, so I've updated it.

I thought from the (many!) emails that I read on talk-gb, we weren't using post towns given these are for Royal Mail and not OSM? Cowie is a village so it doesn't make sense to tag it as a suburb of its post town. So I've retagged all of these to move the suburb to the city.

Thanks but I was referring to the separate value, which can be used to indicate there is a sidewalk mapped separately as described here: sidewalk=*

Hi, what does your comment mean "for modelling"?

You might want to use sidewalk=separate on these roads instead :)

Why change it to suburb when it's not one? Surely changing the city to would be better?

Not sure there's really a need to remove shop=vacant here...

Better to add access tags here, if it's impassable for all modes then access=private or =no

Hi, I've removed the name from these paths as they are already part of the SUW relation.
Also, please can you use a more descriptive changeset comment than just "edit"? :)

Thanks, I've tagged it as tourism=chalet

Hi, welcome to OSM. Just wondering what it is you were looking to add here - is this separate to the rest of the holiday park?

Probably better to use the amenity=social_facility tag instead?

Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edits. If you know whether there is a pavement on one or both sides, it might be worth tagging the road with sidewalk=left/right/both - see sidewalk=*

Hi, thanks for adding buildings and addresses. However, just to make you aware that the Bing imagery is out of alignment. If you turn on the OSMUK Cadastral Parcels layer then you can use that to help you fix the Bing offset, which seems to be about 4,-1.5 in this area. :)

It would've been the latter - it only had the brand wikidata and not the wikipedia so iD offered to add it.

Which apps suggest this is a cycleway?