Hi, you've added access=no to some paths here, e.g. way/967597612#map=18/55.91219/-3.54247 - are these paths open to walk and cycle along?

Hi, please try and use a better changeset comment if possible - saying "added bus stop" would be much better as "local area corrections" doesn't tell other users what you've changed, thanks :)

Hi, saw your tweet about this location :)
I've changed the planter line to a node on the cycleway (similar to how you would represent a bollard).
There appears to be some traffic calming bumps/humps on nearby roads, might be worth adding those as well.
Also, do you know what this new building is? way/966442916

Hi, just to make you aware that if you're adding paths you really should make the path connect to another road/path - this one for example is connected to nothing: way/957403422
Also, although the Bing imagery is newer and better, it is slightly out of alignment. If you are editing please enable the "OSMUK Cadastral Parcels" overlay and align Bing with the blue lines (for me it was about 3.50,-1.50). Thanks! :)

Hi, I've fixed the building you attempted to add here, and also added an access road from the east. Let me know if the map accurately reflects what's on the ground, thanks.

Don't think this should be a pedestrian area - going by Mapillary it just seems like a normal road but with paving stones, and the only restriction is no parking?

way/907778681 this bit might need to be updated, seems to be open? https://youtu.be/YSwv_sB2-yM?t=395

To answer the other changeset - don't know how to partially revert and not sure what history I removed?

Sorry about the untagged nodes, not easy to see them JOSM! Didn't think the layer tag was needed as almost none of the other piers in OSM have a layer tag.

Regarding this changeset - don't forget to check the offset of imagery, as you moved the platform out of alignment with everything else :)

I've reverted this changeset to restore the more detailed outline of the loch.

Maybe these shouldn't be tracks?

Hi, not sure if you're aware but the Bing imagery is slightly out of alignment with the existing map data, OS and ESRI clarity (old Bing).
There is a OSM UK Cadastral parcel background layer available to hep align Bing, you can add an offset of 3.3,-2.4 which I used when making changes here. :)

Please be aware of the note tag that you missed, it's not a one way road way/145981769

In that case, as we can't really have each fairway tagged as an individual golf course, I've added them to a relation and removed the larger area. relation/12910287

Hi, I've removed the golf course tag from each individual hole you mapped and added a rough outline of the golf course instead, feel free to improve it. way/960212522

The preset list is non-exhaustive and shipwrecks are more common :)
Going by the photo here: https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/2083350 I've changed it to a memorial plaque. Not sure if needs a separate historic=aircraft_wreck

I thought HBOS was just the company name of the merged banks. But anyway I've fixed those two, going by Mapillary/Geograph and confirmed on the BOS website.

Think there's a difference between "normal" missing data and the need for someone to check something specific in this case, which is exactly the sort of thing that a note should be used for?

Notes can be seen by users who are surveying an area using the StreetComplete app, easily shown on osm.org and can be viewed in an RSS feed. IMO more likely to be seen and acted upon than a fixme :)

Might be worth adding the PO opening hours if you can get them :)

Is the path alongside the A702 you've tagged as bicycle=designated actually a signed shared use path or just a narrow pavement?

HBOS isn't a bank so not sure why you added that name? And it would also be better if you added a note to the map instead of a fixme tag, as they are more likely to be noticed, surveyed, and fixed.

Not sure how access=no on a path where the tag is not needed is an improvement.