GinaroZ's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 94847066 | about 5 years ago | Hi, welcome to OSM. I've fixed the edits by removing the housenumber tag from the building - better to use nodes instead.
|
| 91703030 | about 5 years ago | Remember you can check the Mapillary / OpenStreetCam layers in iD - there's imagery which shows it as an Aldi :)
|
| 90326433 | about 5 years ago | The signs are not green along the entire length, e.g. https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/qq4GvZr836qOvFO18BdUAg
The first two have previously been green signs. It is also not legally classified as a trunk road by Transport Scotland. |
| 90326433 | about 5 years ago | The A697 is not a trunk road, please change it back to primary |
| 94134131 | about 5 years ago | Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edits.
|
| 92040967 | about 5 years ago | Thanks, I've added the building way/872041799 |
| 94017217 | about 5 years ago | Basically in this case relations are made up of the paths/roads of the walking route. As you can see from the orange line I've rerouted the WIW to follow the inland route, thanks: relation/1756633#map=13/55.8749/-5.1205 |
| 94107804 | about 5 years ago | Hi, thanks for the edit however the address is already tagged on this node node/4298776976 |
| 94017217 | about 5 years ago | Hi, generally we don't add the name of walking routes to individual paths - instead we use a relation like this: relation/1756633#map=13/55.8858/-5.1258 Does the West Island Way route go inland here rather than following the A886? |
| 94000956 | about 5 years ago | Hi, please can you add a more useful changeset comment than "various changes" in future. We know that you've made various changes, but here for example even "added buildings and waterway" would be better. |
| 90525204 | about 5 years ago | You've split some roads here but these don't look like dual carriageways? |
| 93791033 | about 5 years ago | Hi, please be careful - the new Bing imagery is sometimes out of alignment with the existing OSM data. You might need to add an offset in the editor to match the data, which is based on ESRI clarity or OS OpenData StreetView |
| 93699382 | about 5 years ago | Hi, thanks for the update to this - I've removed the access=no |
| 92776541 | about 5 years ago | You've got the tagging of this the wrong way round - it should be highway=proposed |
| 92975388 | about 5 years ago | You seem to have changed farmland and parking into buildings and water in this area - any particular reason for this? |
| 93366783 | about 5 years ago | Hi, thanks for the edit however I've moved the Loanhead Car Sales name from the building to the area here: way/865947589 |
| 93142574 | about 5 years ago | Did you notice that the buildings and other roads are not aligned to Bing? |
| 93234214 | about 5 years ago | Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edit. I've moved the address details from the building to a node at the approx location of the door - hope this matches what's on the ground. Feel free to add more address details to the surrounding houses if you have local knowledge :) |
| 93188579 | about 5 years ago | Please do not vandalise the map. |
| 91848585 | about 5 years ago | Is this signed as a cycle path? |