Using highway=raceway here is tagging for the renderer...

Please be careful as you merged Armadale's marker with a junction/traffic lights.

Is this actually a hospital, or a GPs surgery (which would be amenity=doctors in OSM)? In either case you should also add a building=yes tag to this.

No problem, thanks for sorting it :)

There's actually updated Maxar imagery for this area, so I've added the new building.

Thanks for adding this, however if it is a road under construction it should be tagged as highway=construction.
Also, the soccer pitch and other building are no longer present on the imagery - they should be deleted from the map, especially if you've just added a road right through the pitch!

Please write a more useful changeset comment when make your edits - something like "improved road geometry, add guest house" would be better for other people looking at the history.

Thanks for the reply. Can I suggest that in future you create a note so that local mappers might notice it and then survey the new roads? For example: note/1905182

Hi, do you know the street names of these new residential roads?

You'll need to fix this as the coastline should match the MWHS - ie the blue line on OS_OpenData_StreetView - and not the beach here.

Hi, can I ask why this is a non-viable route?

What's the reason for removing the ref from this road? way/26763787

Sure, but from reading the wiki it should be secondary as the B981 passes through the roundabout: junction=roundabout?uselang=en-GB#Selection_of_the_right_highway_tag

Why have you changed the gyratory to primary?

Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edit. However I've had to remove this residential area as there's clearly not houses here. Can you explain what you trying to do by adding it?

Thanks for the edit however the name shouldn't be added as it's already in the route relation.

This edit has been reverted

It's the first edit of a Maps.me user, I doubt they have any idea of what a changeset and what you're talking about.

Well as it's not currently in use but the rails are still in place it meets the OSM definition of disused. It's not under construction either with detailed designs being drawn up.

Well no, if it's not actually an active construction site then use something else like proposed=*. But railway=disused is fine for now because the rails are still in place - don't worry, there will lots of publicity when works actually begin!