What was inappropriate about these access tag? It is a core path therefore non-motorised access is allowed

assume you made this change based on the tweet - though the connection to the service road probably needs removing based on no Strava heatmap and the follow up tweet?
https://twitter.com/johnrobson87/status/1782063087492751809

did you mean to change this, as it is now a flush kerb? node/11666065119/history

Thanks, but just be aware that you added a duplicate petrol station here on the roof area (which I've now removed)

Hi, is this bit meant to be one way way/1246822985 as it means no eastbound routing on a cycle path from York Place to London Road?

yeah I've just removed it

This is already mapped node/2964238033 - please do not add duplicates

Which OS map has this spelling? As Royal Mail, OS StreetView, and the latest out of copyright OS maps all have Clinthill

Hi, what is the source of this informaton?

Thanks, I've updated it, hopefully that's correct.

Assume this is now in use by traffic? As it needs to be tagged with junction=roundabout

Should be possible to remove the outline, but I've kept it and retagged it with the former prefix in case another mapper comes along and readds the golf course.

Hi, just wondering why you changed the reference of this road?

Hi Chris, thanks for adding these buildings. Just to note that if a building already has a addr:housenumber then it doesn't need to be duplicated in the name tag :)

Did you mean to remove the NCN National Route 75 name from the relation? As other relations still have that name pattern

Hi, thanks for updating this - however I've changed it back to brownfield as residential is for when work is complete.
If and when construction starts then feel free to change it to landuse=construction

Hi, guessing there must've been a reason for why I mapped in the first place. Esri (clarity) shows it clearer and it seems to continue on further, maybe there was some Strava heatmap previously, or I saw photos/video of something in the area (can't remember!).

Suppose the good thing is that it doesn't connect to any other paths so not much chance of it being wrongly used by people. Perhaps additional tags better than deleting but up to you.

Assume Tolbooth Wynd is now two way?

In case you were wondering, I did that at the Bevy as basically the path is wide and also used by vehicles servicing the park etc, assume the same applies for these ones in the Glen?

Assume this is meant to be residential? Strange that StreetComplete made it just a road...