Are these two paths really bridges along their entire length? way/971323844#map=16/55.8583/-5.4031

Not sure why you removed the car parks, retail area and details inside Asda - but I've added them back.

Does this actually exist?

We cannot use Google Maps to update OSM (and even then I can't see any of the bypass on their imagery).
However it is definitely open: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-south-scotland-60198993
https://youtu.be/udLLfexMLdI?t=68
https://twitter.com/transcotland/status/1488468998589194242 - therefore I have reverted your changeset.
The B77 number is on signs at the roundabouts at either end so that's what should be used for now :)

"The Maybole Bypass has not been constructed yet." - source?

Is this project documented anywhere, like on the OSM wiki? Surely you won't be using multiple leisure=pitch tags for this purpose?

There's a fingerpost at either end of this route which say "low tide route", is that not enough to get it named?

Erm, don't think you need to have each part of the court individually mapped...

It was this video I added it from - as well as changed it from a road to a cycleway: https://youtu.be/3vMDRXxfm4E?t=8

Hi, not sure if you are aware but the Bing imagery here is slightly out of alignment with existing features. Before you start aligning things here it's best to turn on the OSMUK Cadastral Parcels overlay and use a background offset of 1.5,-2.6, thanks.

Thanks for adding these. I typed in "pure" and PureGym came up for me, so I've updated it.

I thought from the (many!) emails that I read on talk-gb, we weren't using post towns given these are for Royal Mail and not OSM? Cowie is a village so it doesn't make sense to tag it as a suburb of its post town. So I've retagged all of these to move the suburb to the city.

Thanks but I was referring to the separate value, which can be used to indicate there is a sidewalk mapped separately as described here: sidewalk=*

Hi, what does your comment mean "for modelling"?

You might want to use sidewalk=separate on these roads instead :)

Why change it to suburb when it's not one? Surely changing the city to would be better?

Not sure there's really a need to remove shop=vacant here...

Better to add access tags here, if it's impassable for all modes then access=private or =no

Hi, I've removed the name from these paths as they are already part of the SUW relation.
Also, please can you use a more descriptive changeset comment than just "edit"? :)

Thanks, I've tagged it as tourism=chalet