OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
103640678 over 4 years ago

Hi FJJ, welcome back to OSM :)
Are these streets that you've named now open? If so the highway=construction could be changed to =residential

103554089 over 4 years ago

Hi, just wondering why you disconnected this road from the A1? node/8663166687

103294349 over 4 years ago

I've fixed the gate so it's on the path and not the road: node/1977142347 :)

103359020 over 4 years ago

Thanks for sorting this, I've closed my note :)

102503084 over 4 years ago

Thanks for sorting it.
Also, if you have local knowledge it might be worth having a look at the various map notes in the area to see if you can fix the issues they are highlighting: osm.org/#map=15/55.9541/-2.7845&layers=N

102503084 over 4 years ago

Hi, this driveway is marked as private - is it actually private for all modes of transport or perhaps just vehicles? way/671182400/

102293219 over 4 years ago

The alignment looks good, thanks :)

Just another quick tip - if you press the Q key having selected a building it will "square" it so the corners aren't wonky.

Also, do you know if this road is actually open to vehicles? note/2610482

102066921 over 4 years ago

I moved the block you added onto the A78 to the service road: node/1287060514 - as I assume it's not on the main road :)
Have those traffic lights for the junction and pedestrian crossing been added recently as they aren't visible on the aerial imagery?

102061115 over 4 years ago

Thanks for the reply. If the tracks are still in place but not in use then it should be tagged as railway=disused (instead of abandoned, which is where the tracks have been lifted by you can still see the alignment)

102061115 over 4 years ago

Hi, have the tracks been lifted from this branch?

102149677 over 4 years ago

This change has been reverted. Please check the Bing imagery which clearly shows the road has been rebuilt with a curve.

100629329 over 4 years ago

Hi, please don't forget to "square" buildings instead of drawing them inaccurate and wonky. Also make sure you check the alignment of Bing imagery as it's usually offset compared to the OSM data.

101842320 over 4 years ago

Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edits.
Not sure if you're aware but the Bing imagery is out of alignment - you can go into the editor's background settings and use the imagery offset to fix it (type in 1.5,-2.6).
I've fixed the building that you moved and also this recycling node as I think you dragged it across the map
node/498847384

101587928 almost 5 years ago

Ok I've marked it as access=private so it should be faded out a bit

101587928 almost 5 years ago

Hi, welcome to OSM. I've added this feature back to map - just because it's not public doesn't mean it can't be mapped, it can be tagged with access restrictions if needed.

100512192 almost 5 years ago

I've fixed the buildings you added - just be aware that the Bing imagery is slightly out of alignment here so needs to be offset before being used for editing :)

101662661 almost 5 years ago

What's the reasoning behind changing the cycleway alongside the tram into a footway and bicycle=no?

101664108 almost 5 years ago

Why have you deleted all of these trees?

101350751 almost 5 years ago

Well an office is not works=* so I've changed it to landuse=commercial :)

101350751 almost 5 years ago

Hi, did you mean to add man_made=works around an office? way/919353697
You also deleted this node, but didn't retain any of the name/product information: node/6887221688/history#map=18/55.91440/-4.19851
And is this actually landfill? way/919353695