Basically in this case relations are made up of the paths/roads of the walking route.

As you can see from the orange line I've rerouted the WIW to follow the inland route, thanks: relation/1756633#map=13/55.8749/-5.1205

Hi, thanks for the edit however the address is already tagged on this node node/4298776976

Hi, generally we don't add the name of walking routes to individual paths - instead we use a relation like this: relation/1756633#map=13/55.8858/-5.1258

Does the West Island Way route go inland here rather than following the A886?

Hi, please can you add a more useful changeset comment than "various changes" in future. We know that you've made various changes, but here for example even "added buildings and waterway" would be better.

You've split some roads here but these don't look like dual carriageways?

Hi, please be careful - the new Bing imagery is sometimes out of alignment with the existing OSM data. You might need to add an offset in the editor to match the data, which is based on ESRI clarity or OS OpenData StreetView

Hi, thanks for the update to this - I've removed the access=no

You've got the tagging of this the wrong way round - it should be highway=proposed

You seem to have changed farmland and parking into buildings and water in this area - any particular reason for this?

Hi, thanks for the edit however I've moved the Loanhead Car Sales name from the building to the area here: way/865947589

Did you notice that the buildings and other roads are not aligned to Bing?

Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edit. I've moved the address details from the building to a node at the approx location of the door - hope this matches what's on the ground. Feel free to add more address details to the surrounding houses if you have local knowledge :)

Please do not vandalise the map.

Is this signed as a cycle path?

Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edits. I've merged the details from this node you added as it was duplicate of the building.

In what way is it designed for cyclists?
And what value does tagging it bicycle=yes add for the path users when it is neither a core path or a shared use path?

Hi, thanks for adding further details - however there was already a petrol station mapped so I've merged them into one object.

Hi, I've changed these to landuse=farmyard areas instead of shops

That's not how it works though. If there's no sign indicating it's a shared use path then it's just a normal pavement for pedestrians - I've now tagged it as such.

No worries, thanks for fixing it :)