A node anywhere is probably better than on the way, though you might be able to take a guess from Bing Streetside and the picture on the school's website?

Hi, welcome to OSM. Can I ask why you have deleted this road? way/23961265/history
嗨，欢迎来到OSM。 我可以问你为什么要删除这条路吗？

In case you're unaware, this edit was made in Scotland not England ;-)

Hi, are you trying to add an address in this edit? Because number 9 is already mapped on the building.

Is this path open? way/639134949 if so it should be changed to highway=cycleway and the construction tag removed

Think it would better with a separate node for the pool, assuming the whole building is not dedicated to swimming?

Hi, is this an actual post office counter or just a delivery office (better tagged as amenity=post_depot)? node/6225433952

Where did you get the ICAO code for node/2176992418 from?

Dashcam on youtube shows it's 70 all the way. Be nice if we got some gps traces whilst we wait for bing to update as some bits need smoothing.

way/350973810 is all 70mph, right?

way/659876969 assume that start_date is meant to be something else?

Hi, is this entire building the library? If so then you should delete the duplicate node here: node/699543979
Also, the format for the opening hours is wrong, try using a tool like http://projets.pavie.info/yohours/ to produce the correct syntax.

Thanks, have added surface=asphalt and lcn=yes to highlight it as a useful link to the NCN.

If you are adding sidewalks then you need to ensure they connect to something at both ends (for routing purposes) otherwise it's a waste of time mapping them, for example: way/660334988

Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edit. I notice you've changed the name of this shop to Savers - node/3670328421 is it still an electronics shop or has the shop type changed as well? If so you should change the shop= tag.

Did you manage to survey this pavilion as its shape seems to have changed going by the new imagery? way/60093491/history

Hi, saw your edit of
way/635156291 - I think the best thing to do when you have a short section where no motor vehicles are allowed is to mark as footway, which I've done.

relation/9106626#map=19/55.96969/-3.19300 isn't rendered, presumably because of a gap in the relation?

Hi, does this path way/650607263 connect to the one just south of it?

Saw your tweet - I assume you also checked the bing imagery which looks ok?
Might want to add bridges where the road goes above the railway :)