GinaroZ's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 50084694 | about 8 years ago | Hi, not sure if you're aware but the correct tag for a "football" pitch is sport=soccer, I've fixed this one: way/505591477 |
| 54657260 | about 8 years ago | I've improved the school tagging by adding "construction:" :) The green gym is tagged as a sports_centre but I doubt that's appropriate - probably a fitness_station or playground instead? |
| 44998218 | about 8 years ago | Just to let you know that I've changed this line way/464533061 and others around it to the more used man_made=cutline |
| 54686447 | about 8 years ago | Presumably this section should be a part of the E/W relation? relation/5880467 |
| 54682467 | about 8 years ago | Hi, did you survey the Clyde Arc before you made the change to oneway=yes? Because the previous changeset said it was two parallel two way roads: way/4287346/history |
| 54607184 | about 8 years ago | Yeah, if it's not a dock then the coastline should continue into the harbour. I've left the landuse=harbour area where it is, but also added the coastline around it. |
| 54657260 | about 8 years ago | If it's not open then I'd suggest using landuse=construction and construction:amenity=school instead, so it doesn't appear on the map as an active school.
|
| 54607184 | about 8 years ago | Hi, does the harbour have a gate at its entrance and is it tidal? |
| 54610532 | about 8 years ago | Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edit. Just wondering if you meant to change this from a path to coastline - as it definitely looks like a path to me. |
| 54515700 | about 8 years ago | Hi, does this path way/545871315 connect to the road? |
| 54446220 | about 8 years ago | Andrew,
|
| 54447703 | about 8 years ago | Hi, for roundabouts like this: way/545375954 you should tag them with junction=roundabout instead of oneway=yes :) |
| 54347576 | about 8 years ago | Removed |
| 54406729 | about 8 years ago | Hi, these parks you've added seem like someone's front garden to me - and are there really two lakes there on the ground? |
| 54406386 | about 8 years ago | The problem with this edit is that you removed the entire building and shop data which I had added :) I've just seen the other comments - I would say that if you are adding a website there is no licence issue. However if you want to add building data but there is nothing visible on Bing, you can press "B" for the background list in the editor and try another one like DigitalGlobe or Esri. That way there is no potential licence issue with the planning portal. |
| 54406386 | about 8 years ago | Please explain why you have deleted this building? It is visible on DigitalGlobe and Esri imagery. |
| 54312851 | about 8 years ago | One thing I noticed in Stirling: node/4768730523 - assume that's meant to be an outdoor shop, don't know if you've seen it on your travels! |
| 54347576 | about 8 years ago | Hi, this doesn't seem like a park to me... |
| 54329112 | about 8 years ago | Ok, but I don't think this can be classed as a park - it looks like someone's front garden: way/544535842
|
| 54329112 | about 8 years ago | Thanks for changing it back.
|