The problem with this edit is that you removed the entire building and shop data which I had added :)

I've just seen the other comments - I would say that if you are adding a website there is no licence issue.

However if you want to add building data but there is nothing visible on Bing, you can press "B" for the background list in the editor and try another one like DigitalGlobe or Esri. That way there is no potential licence issue with the planning portal.

Please explain why you have deleted this building? It is visible on DigitalGlobe and Esri imagery.

One thing I noticed in Stirling: node/4768730523 - assume that's meant to be an outdoor shop, don't know if you've seen it on your travels!

Hi, this doesn't seem like a park to me...

Ok, but I don't think this can be classed as a park - it looks like someone's front garden: way/544535842
And why change this building to landuse=retail? way/246235100/

Thanks for changing it back.
However I see you've added a number of parks as well - are these open to the public or are they private gardens?
Also, does this bit of water really exist? way/544538090

Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edit. Just wondering why you've changed one section of Colinton Road to highway=primary?

Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edit. Just a bit of advice for your next edit - you can press S to square the buildings - I've done that with these ones you've added :)

Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edit.
Notice you have requested a review - this looks good to me, as do your other changes in the construction area :)

Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edit.
The new part of Milnwood Crescent you added - does this share the same name?
Also, a tip for next time you add a building - press S to "square" the shape :)

Hi. I've updated your edit by merging the building and node data.
If you add any more websites in future, I'd suggest adding them to the node or building which also has the shop=supermarket tag :)

Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edits.
Just to let you know that the oneway=no tag you added here: way/62046744 is usually unnecessary - perhaps you could tag the missing speed limits in Killearn?
This is a map of speed limits in that area: http://product.itoworld.com/map/5?lon=-4.37299&lat=56.04204&zoom=14

Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edit. Just wondering why you added the motor_vehicle=no tag to just this section of road?

Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edit. I saw you added both an untagged area and named node for the park - I've combined these together.

Noticed there was a fixme here node/92654858 - is this a cave entrance as well?

Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edit. However you seem to have changed the Water of Leith into an underground river, and added a duplicate and address.
Therefore, I have reverted the changes - let me know if you have questions. Cheers

The third track should really be tagged like the other two if the electrification method is the same - as electrified=rail specifically means a third rail system not overhead wires.

Hi, don't think you need footway=sidewalk on this path as it's not beside a road.

Bonjour. relation/1162809 est un bâtiment démoli, donc ne devrait pas avoir une étiquette de construction.

I have no problem with the changes - my suggestion would be to provide a better changeset comment.
If you had said "Changing substance=sewer -> sewage in pipelines to properly describe the substance carried" it would have been more obvious what you changed :)