GinaroZ's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 51773846 | over 8 years ago | *seem |
| 51773846 | over 8 years ago | You seen to have deleted part of the B935 by mistake |
| 51616656 | over 8 years ago | Agreed this should be changed back to trunk as I don't think it's officially a motorway on the ground, despite what the source website says? |
| 51627214 | over 8 years ago | Stray node: node/5072236731 don't know if it's meant to be something? |
| 51452213 | over 8 years ago | Did you delete the road continuing north by accident or has it really been removed? way/435021428 |
| 51154436 | over 8 years ago | Hi, I've changed the rest of the C21 to tertiary as you had left some of it as unclassified from here way/416229200 |
| 51516417 | over 8 years ago | Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edit. I've added the shop=jewelry tag so it appears on the map as a jewellers. |
| 51462915 | over 8 years ago | Why did you remove amenity=school from way/26654202/ ? |
| 51345091 | over 8 years ago | Hi. Not sure why you added these contour lines, will you be removing them shortly? |
| 51340295 | over 8 years ago | Hi Gordon, you'll need to connect this path to both of the roads as just now it's an unconnected island :) |
| 51305204 | over 8 years ago | You've managed to delete a section of coastline east of Dundee. It'll need to be added back or this changeset will require reverting. Also, normally the MHWS is marked using the blue line in OS StreetView OpenData background layer. |
| 46228176 | over 8 years ago | Isn't node/4694363660 better tagged as shop=opticians? |
| 51272573 | over 8 years ago | What effect were you looking to achieve? |
| 51214917 | over 8 years ago | Perhaps it should also be tagged as tourism=guest_house if it is indeed a guest house/b&b? |
| 51179954 | over 8 years ago | How does way/206875957 cross the railway line? Via a level crossing or a bridge/tunnel? |
| 51177381 | over 8 years ago | Did you not notice this area was marked as brownfield? way/7917034/history The building no longer exists and new housing is being built in this area. I know it looks obvious from Bing imagery but please check the area to see why no buildings are mapped! :) |
| 51093359 | over 8 years ago | Thanks for the reply. The problem now is that the name is not rendered on the standard map! :)
|
| 51093359 | over 8 years ago | Hi, can I ask why you've removed the suburb node? And just wondering if you plan on removing the others from Edinburgh as well? |
| 51009705 | over 8 years ago | Segregated with a white line down the middle (if so should be one path and segregated=yes) or actually two separate paths? |
| 51009705 | over 8 years ago | Looks like you've added a duplicate footway way/514571519 - I assume the cyclepath is shared use? |