OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
51773846 over 8 years ago

*seem

51773846 over 8 years ago

You seen to have deleted part of the B935 by mistake

51616656 over 8 years ago

Agreed this should be changed back to trunk as I don't think it's officially a motorway on the ground, despite what the source website says?

51627214 over 8 years ago

Stray node: node/5072236731 don't know if it's meant to be something?

51452213 over 8 years ago

Did you delete the road continuing north by accident or has it really been removed? way/435021428

51154436 over 8 years ago

Hi, I've changed the rest of the C21 to tertiary as you had left some of it as unclassified from here way/416229200

51516417 over 8 years ago

Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edit. I've added the shop=jewelry tag so it appears on the map as a jewellers.

51462915 over 8 years ago

Why did you remove amenity=school from way/26654202/ ?

51345091 over 8 years ago

Hi. Not sure why you added these contour lines, will you be removing them shortly?

51340295 over 8 years ago

Hi Gordon, you'll need to connect this path to both of the roads as just now it's an unconnected island :)

51305204 over 8 years ago

You've managed to delete a section of coastline east of Dundee. It'll need to be added back or this changeset will require reverting. Also, normally the MHWS is marked using the blue line in OS StreetView OpenData background layer.

46228176 over 8 years ago

Isn't node/4694363660 better tagged as shop=opticians?

51272573 over 8 years ago

What effect were you looking to achieve?

51214917 over 8 years ago

Perhaps it should also be tagged as tourism=guest_house if it is indeed a guest house/b&b?

51179954 over 8 years ago

How does way/206875957 cross the railway line? Via a level crossing or a bridge/tunnel?

51177381 over 8 years ago

Did you not notice this area was marked as brownfield? way/7917034/history The building no longer exists and new housing is being built in this area. I know it looks obvious from Bing imagery but please check the area to see why no buildings are mapped! :)

51093359 over 8 years ago

Thanks for the reply. The problem now is that the name is not rendered on the standard map! :)
All of the suburbs in Edinburgh are mapped with a node and area. I agree that a solution needs to be found with place areas and a label node.
I will revert this changeset to put the node back.

51093359 over 8 years ago

Hi, can I ask why you've removed the suburb node? And just wondering if you plan on removing the others from Edinburgh as well?

51009705 over 8 years ago

Segregated with a white line down the middle (if so should be one path and segregated=yes) or actually two separate paths?

51009705 over 8 years ago

Looks like you've added a duplicate footway way/514571519 - I assume the cyclepath is shared use?