Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edit. I've added the shop=jewelry tag so it appears on the map as a jewellers.

Why did you remove amenity=school from way/26654202/ ?

Hi. Not sure why you added these contour lines, will you be removing them shortly?

Hi Gordon, you'll need to connect this path to both of the roads as just now it's an unconnected island :)

You've managed to delete a section of coastline east of Dundee. It'll need to be added back or this changeset will require reverting. Also, normally the MHWS is marked using the blue line in OS StreetView OpenData background layer.

Isn't node/4694363660 better tagged as shop=opticians?

What effect were you looking to achieve?

Perhaps it should also be tagged as tourism=guest_house if it is indeed a guest house/b&b?

How does way/206875957 cross the railway line? Via a level crossing or a bridge/tunnel?

Did you not notice this area was marked as brownfield? way/7917034/history The building no longer exists and new housing is being built in this area. I know it looks obvious from Bing imagery but please check the area to see why no buildings are mapped! :)

Thanks for the reply. The problem now is that the name is not rendered on the standard map! :)
All of the suburbs in Edinburgh are mapped with a node and area. I agree that a solution needs to be found with place areas and a label node.
I will revert this changeset to put the node back.

Hi, can I ask why you've removed the suburb node? And just wondering if you plan on removing the others from Edinburgh as well?

Segregated with a white line down the middle (if so should be one path and segregated=yes) or actually two separate paths?

Looks like you've added a duplicate footway way/514571519 - I assume the cyclepath is shared use?

Well that depends on the time of day you go there - it's only a full "beach" for at most half a day. :)

It's the bit down from the caravan park which is last to fill with water that the sand is dry, the rest of it wet and not what you'd call a beach - more like mud/tidalfat IMO.

The beach I mapped at Burntisland was the actual sandy bit, where it slopes down to meet rocks and wet sand. Some of that will be covered at high tide but it's better than mapping the whole bay as beach - need something to differentiate between the sand and mud.

Can't see anything on the wiki about mapping the beach to the low tide? Also if you look at the very similar Crammond Island it's not a huge beach: relation/361458

Hi, shouldn't way/40936778/ be secondary, as that's the main through road? See the wiki for more info

Saw something that needed editing so just fixed it myself.

Hi, just wondering why you changed this route to state=proposed?

Is node/4382552503 not better tagged as shop=e-cigarette?

Hi just wondering what's the reasoning behind changing the unclassified road to a track?