Hi, just wondering why you moved all of these POIs? Same with the other two edits you made to Edinburgh recently.

Hi, please do not add features which are already mapped, thanks.

Thanks for improving the tagging, just a shame the names aren't rendered on the standard layer :(

I've moved the "tunnel" and improved the road going by OS street view/old OS maps - don't think you'll have much joy with GPS there except in winter.
If there's still a path or road going across it might be better as a bridge.

Thanks, was just strange to see a tunnel here, especially with nothing on top of it. Seems like this is it: http://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/139182

Is way/433841106/ really a tunnel?

Hi, I've removed this area. Please use the share option and include a marker if you wish to link to or share an area.

Thanks for the reply. Just a bit strange as you added it on top of sport pitches :)
I've passed by on the main roads but due to the trees and hedges you can't see much except the main building. Could be a small building but without updated aerial imagery or a survey we'll never know.

I'd probably say yes - given they cover a decent area (108, 35 and 25 sq mi) and are fairly important as a step below national parks. Plus there's only 3 of them.

While we wait for regional_park to be rendered, the other option is to change them to national park instead of nature reserve, as they have been declared as such by the government (mentioned in the wiki) - or just leave them?

Some AONBs seem to have been tagged in England and NI, though perhaps wrongly as national parks?

wrong changeset comment - should be: "fix junctions"

Might be worth leaving a comment on the changeset or sending a message to let her know :)

Should way/438558805 really be primary_link? Can't remember seeing a _link used for an at-grade roundabout before

Hi, from what I can see the A77 has been highway=primary ever since it was added to the map. So I'm wondering what makes you think it should be a trunk road?

Oops, saw it deleted on https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=49272844 but should've checked by editing the map :)

Did you meant to delete this path? way/200228901

Honestly I'm not too sure either - nothing much on any mailing lists, and the only real place it's mentioned in the wiki is osm.wiki/NaPTAN/Surveying_and_Merging_NaPTAN_and_OSM_data

Looking at imported stops in Edinburgh without the verified tag, seems like they were removed 3 years ago by a mapper who probably just checked their existance changeset/17791127

But since it's a NaPTAN tag, maybe it's just to check the stop is actually there?

Hi,
Any particular reason why you deleted lit=no from a number of paths and roads?

Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edits. Just a few comments on your changes:
way/498060269 - if this doesn't have A&E then it should be tagged with emergency=no
School buildings, when enclosed in school grounds shouldn't have a name: way/394657414
Cheers

Hi, noticed you added a note saying this bus stop is present and has been verified: node/502532560 - if so you should probably remove the naptan:verified tag. Same goes for other stops.

It seems like all 3 of Scotland's regional parks have been tagged as nature reserves - perhaps as the boundary=protected_area tag on its own doesn't render on the standard layer?
Don't know if boundary=national_park would be appropriate or only for use on Cairngorms/Loch Lomond?