Hallo!
Mir ist der Weg way/388787816
mit highway=turning_circle aufgefallen.
Dieses Tag dient eigentlich dazu, die Mitte des Wendepunktes zu markieren,
sprich, man zeichnet den Weg bis zur Mitte und gibt den Knoten ein highway=turning_circle
Macht aus meiner Sicht auch mehr Sinn, denn man fährt ja nicht am Rand entlang.

Hi there!
I found the tag highway=project which is only used here. Why didn't you use proposed or construction ?

OK, thanks for the feedback.

yes, looks strange. I am not a local, but Google Streetview shows a very differnt
picture coming from south west and seems to be quite actual.

Hi there!
You have added highway=track to some nodes here. Was that intended?

Hi there!
Please check highway=ra, not sure what was meant (guess traffic_signals ?):
node/3910032278

Feel free to improve it, I just tried to fix
the tag highway=crossing;traffic_signals

Wenn der Track da ist, aber nicht ganz an der richtigen Stelle, dann ist es besser,
highway=track zu lassen und evtl. ein fixme=position o.ä. hinzuzufügen.
Auf dem Satellitenbild sieht es allerdings so aus, als ob der viel weiter nördlich verläuft und an diesem Punkt ankommt:
node/3158723097

Hi there!
You have use highway=turning_circle
for some ways. This tag is meant to be used on a node to ease the mapping of these small areas, when you draw a way it should be tagged with e.g. highway=residential or highway=service.
When there is an obstacle like a tree and you want to use a single node, use highway=turning_loop.
See also
highway=turning_circle

Moin!
Du hast einen highway=track auf
highway=fixme_Lage geändert. War das Absicht oder wolltest Du ein fixme=Lage hinzufügen?

Hi there!
I think highway=crossing should not be used to map a traffic island, it is meant to be used for the node where a footway is connected to a major road.
See highway=crossing
To map this island you may use
landuse=traffic_island with barrier=kerb.

Hi there!
Please check this way tagged highway=crossing:
way/387752604
It partly duplicates the footway
way/387747952
The tag highway=crossing should be used for the node, so I guess you meant highway=footway, footway=crossing ?
The aerial image doesn't show much detail.

Hi there!
You have changed a highway=cycleway to
highway=crossing:
way/6933292
This tag should only be used for nodes,
was it intended?

I've looked at Taginfo, esp. this list:
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/api/4/key/values?key=natural&sortname=value&sortorder=asc&format=json_pretty&filter=ways
and checked those entries that look like typos.

No, I just looked for unusual natural=* tags.

Hi Jon,
my thinking was that the traffic lights are only for the crossing, not for anything else. In that case it seems redundant to me.

OK, thanks for the feedback :-)

Hi there!
I noticed a typo crossing=trafic_signals (one missing f) here:
node/3909605210
I did not yet change it because you've also added two nodes with
highway=_trafic_signals (same typo) and I think these are obsolete as they are duplicating the meaning of the above node. What do you think ?

Hallo und frohe Weihnachten!
Mir sind ein paar Knoten mit dem veralteten highway=traffic_calming aufgefallen.
Bitte verwende traffic_calming=* .
Siehe auch
osm.wiki/DE:Key:traffic_calming

Hi there!
You have changed
highway=unclassified
to
highway=unclassified;residential
for this way:
way/387670726
What was intended?