OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
35086990 about 10 years ago

no idea?

35189030 about 10 years ago

please review: the tag
highway=path;footway
is invalid.
way/283162433

35188829 about 10 years ago

bitte prüfen:
Beim mergen ist was schiefgegangen:
highway=track;service
surface=gravel;paved
Habe leider keine Ortskenntnis.

34966642 about 10 years ago

reg. the name: I am not a local, so I can't say. The original tags said Norris Street
for the longer part of the current way.
The tiger tags still show both variants, so yes, please add a note and I'd try to contact Richard , the initial mapper:
@Richard

30054404 about 10 years ago

please review the junction near
node/1373874109
I am not a local, and maybe Bing is out-aged here, but
1) I see no direct way like that marked by
way/123114934
2) The link roads should be tagged
highway=secondary_link, not residential_link
3) Also the two link roads
near node/1373874107 seem to be
highway=secondary_link, not primary_link
(guess that was just overseen when the way way/123103585 was changed from primary to secondary

27969043 about 10 years ago

please review ways
way/320759609
and
way/320759628
If you call those links, I think they should be tagged primary_link, not residential_link. On Bing they also look like oneways.

29417989 about 10 years ago

please review:
I've changed the tag highway=residential_link
to tertiary_link:
changeset/35210851
Not sure why you selected residential_link ?

34245634 about 10 years ago

please review:
I've changed highway=residential_link
to
highway=service
service=parking_aisle
changeset/35210733
See also
highway=service

35132494 about 10 years ago

OK. Thanks for the feedback!

35137906 about 10 years ago

thanks for the quick feedback :-)

35120619 about 10 years ago

well, sorry for my uncommented change.
This "definition" of a *_link is very new to me,
it sounds reasonable, but I wonder why
the wiki documents only *_links for major road types. You probably noted the discussion about my changes:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Undiscussed-edits-removing-lesser-used-highway-tags-tp5859298.html
It would be great to have a few more comments on this question.

35157134 about 10 years ago

bitte prüfen:
4 Wege sind wohl versehentlich als
highway=turning_circle getaggt, scheinen aber Gebäudeteile zu sein:
way/378961398
Was war da gemeint?

35132077 about 10 years ago

please note:
I've changed three ways which were tagged
highway=driveway
to the well documented
highway=service
service=driveway
changeset/35194147
See also
highway=service

35137906 about 10 years ago

please review:
way/362625341
what does
highway=Jana Onufrego Zagłoby mean?
I assume you wanted to change the name tag?

35132494 about 10 years ago

please review:
The tag highway=stop_position is rarely used in OSM. Does it really fix something?

34548911 about 10 years ago

done

34966642 about 10 years ago

Are you sure that the merged road is
named River Side Drive ?

35105253 about 10 years ago

OK, thanks for the feedback and the correction.

34700725 about 10 years ago

I saw that you changed other parts of the relation
relation/2317544
Still, two parts have invalid tags and might be ignored by data consumers:
way/303489122
way/354559053
Please let me know if I can help to fix the problem.

34548911 about 10 years ago

okay, so I'll revert all my changes and leave
highway="bus_stop CUS" untouched in the future until one finds a better way to tag that
element ?