OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
59089949 about 7 years ago

My understanding of the wiki
junction=roundabout
is that the tag junction=roundabout should not be used on nodes at all.
Which routing apps do you mean?

63950537 about 7 years ago

Hi!
Please check typo highway=untrack
on way/593192830
I guess you wanted to change it from unclassified to track, but the northern end
is still a bridge with highway=tertiary which is connected to a highway=unclassified.
Please note that highway=track implies that the road is "mostly agricultural use".
In case of way/593192830 I would opt for unclassified, as well as for the bridge.

63959144 about 7 years ago

I also wonder why the shape of this building is so large:
way/638831279
All sat images show a much smaller building.
Same problem here:
way/638831350
Maybe sat images are out-aged?

63959144 about 7 years ago

Hi!
Why did you change highway=road to the unusual highway=unspecified?
It looks like a highway=residential to me, as well as way/92622380, which is tagged highway=unclassified (!?)

63941290 about 7 years ago

Hi!
Please don't invent new _link road types.
I think the correct tag here would be highway=residential .
See also osm.wiki/Highway_link

59089949 about 7 years ago

Hi!
I've fixed a few more issues at Isingiro Roundabout, see changeset/63968920
I think you should not use junction=roundabout on a node like here:
node/5612340183

63945556 about 7 years ago

Hi! You added highway=crossing to a boundary here, I've reverted this:changeset/63968626
You probably wanted to add this to a node instead?

63950501 about 7 years ago

Moin! Ich habe hier ein highway=crossing an einem landuse=residential entfernt:
changeset/63968545
Anscheinend hast Du in Go Map! das falsche Object ausgewählt?

63943231 about 7 years ago

Hi and welcome to OSM!
You created a lot of ways with the tag highway=crossing here. This tag should only be used on nodes, the ways are typically mapped with highway=footway + footway=crossing. See also highway=crossing
Hope this helps?

63959820 about 7 years ago

Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've noticied this changeset because you created new tags like highway=construction:tertiary here.
The normal way to tag this is to use two tags highway=construction + construction=tertiary.
The alternative would be to use the prefix construction: like this:
construction:highway=tertiary.
But for highways the 1st method is better established. See also osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

29241572 about 7 years ago

Hi. sorry, I forgot to add the information where I saw this stretch of the pipeline:
node/65852866
My understanding is that the way should be split, but it is also often far away from the position shown in the sat images.
I think the above ground section starts at node/65852900 and it ends here:
69.518619501305, -148.56688142359258

29241572 about 7 years ago

Hi!
I just noticed that this pipeline way/253952219
has underground=yes .
I see long stretches which are not underground, so I wonder how to find the place where it is really underground?

63928187 about 7 years ago

Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've noticed this changeset because of the unusual tag highway=parking, please review my changes here:
changeset/63942391
See also amenity=parking
I also noticed that Bing has a large offset here, I think 16.42; -10.75 works quite well.
See osm.wiki/Using_Imagery

63896583 about 7 years ago

Yes, these roads are residential.

63865045 about 7 years ago

Hi again!
I see that you changed the highway type to another unusual value highway=cross_way on
way/637127079
I wonder why you don't map it as a normal zebra crossing?
You seem to concentrate on the bicycle traffic, but you still can use
highway=footway + footway=crossing + crossing_ref=zebra + bicycle=yes
You also added a few separate ways with highway=cycleway. These ways are not properly connected to the other roads, this will cause routing errors. Please check also if you cannot use the cycleway=* tag instead, that makes it much easier to avoid these problems, see highway=cycleway#When_not_to_use

63896583 about 7 years ago

Hi! Please don't invent new _link types for highways like residential_link on
way/638203913
and
way/638203917
You added only one turn restriction. Maybe one is missing at node/10581158?

59322289 about 7 years ago

Ein paar davon habe ich ebenfalls per cs Kommentar kontaktiert, aber mit wenig Erfolg. Kann aus meiner Sicht nur ein Local ändern.

63876373 about 7 years ago

Hi!
You mapped a few ways with highway=yes here. Was that intended?
I changed them here:changeset/63893308

63872782 about 7 years ago

Hi and welcome to OSM!
You mapped a few new roads and buildings here. You did not connect the new roads to the existing roads. Please draw they ways so that they share a node with the another road. Most of the ways that you taghed as highway=track are probably highway=path. See highway=*
Also, you often draw the shapes for the buildings too large, so that they overlap other buildings or the road. Please try to avoid that.

63882301 about 7 years ago

Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've noticed this changeset because of the unusual tag highway=yes. I've changed them to residential here:
changeset/63892144
See also highway=*