please review
changeset/34988364
I've changed the rarely used tag highway=abandoned_track
to abandoned:highway=track

please review:
the tag highway=footpath is rarely used,
I've changed it to highway=path. But that way is a bit alone there ;-)

I've changed them to highway=footway, see
changeset/34988114

I just noticed that way/360073373
has vehicle=destination.
I think that means that it should be
highway=service if that tag is correct.

no idea?

please review way/377676258:
the tag highway=unclassified;secondary
is invalid, this often happens with iD, so take care or maybe use an editor like JOSM ;-)

okay, thanks for the feedback.

please review way/223404211:
highway=weighbridge is rarely used.
Do you think it matches
amenity=weighbridge?
See amenity=weighbridge
See also
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/How-to-tag-a-weigh-station-bridge-tp5858209.html

yes, I try to clean up the highways in OSM to improve quality.
I'll think of a note and let you know when I change them.

I've tried to fix it, see
changeset/34986806
And sorry about the history tag, I though it was historic. Just learned that I can ignore the history tag.

okay, thanks for the info :-)

if you are a local, please check also
way/180186076 and way/81084071.
Is the footway really going through the building? May the building is a building=roof ? Same problem with way/238461936.

thanks for the feedback. Why do they have the fixme tag?

please review way/377638724:
The tag highway=track;unclassified
is invalid. This problem is likely to happen with iD, so please take care ;-)
See highway=*

way/318139461 is still project.
It seems that there is already a path,
so maybe no need to call it proposed?

please review way/93588386:
the tag highway=path;track is invalid,
please correct it. See
highway=track
and
highway=path
Maybe split the way.

please review way/313285301:
the tag highway=footway;path is invalid,
please correct it. This problem is likely to
happen with iD, so take care ;-)

the problem is that routing software might not understand that these ways do not exist.
If you want to stick to that tagging, please add access=no, I'd prefer that you change them to notes

please review way/322698102:
You changed it to highway=2,
I guess you wanted to change the lanes value, so I've changed it to
highway=motorway_link
lanes=2

please review: I found a few nodes with the tag highway=trunk_junction.
I think all of them are
highway=motorway_junction
(also used for primary roads)
See highway=motorway_junction