Hi! Please review this place:
node/5987640316
Sat images show a rail on a bridge, not a level_crossing

Hallo Lokalfürst,

der Weg war vorher auch highway=path,
nie footway. Nach Deinen Hinweisen sollte wohl noch ein surface=ground dran. Ist der Weg way/43785407
wirklich ein Weg mit Sand als Oberfläche?
Und trotzdem bicycle=designated ?
Oder ist das eher fine_gravel?

Hi again!
You moved the nodes of the primary road, e.g. here:
node/4391674976
Was that intended? The GPS traces stored in OSM seem to show that the ways are now too far from each other.
The ways should be placed in the middle of the road, in case of way/24818619 that means the middle of the 2nd lane. The current position seems to be that of the sidewalks.
The problem is that the map says these roads are crossing many buildings which probably isn't true.

The sidewalk tags look OK, but I can't say if the whole stretch of the road has a sidewalk.
The bridge still was not OK. Please check my changes:
changeset/63668975

I don't see a change. Did you save already?

Thanks, looks more plausibe now :-)

First see sidewalk=*
There are two ways to map a sidewalk:
1) add the tag sidewalk to the existing road. Maybe split the road if only a part of it has a sidewalk.
2) add a new way with highway=footway, footway=sidewalk and make sure that it is connected to the road network.
Option 2) is typically more complex and often leads to routing errors for pedestrians.
I have no idea how to do that with Go Map! or iD. Do you know the editor JOSM?

See my cs:
changeset/63668220

Hi! I've just corrected a typo at the roundabout area here:
changeset/63668082
and noticed the way way/444907458
You seem to be a local, do you know which ways are tunnels / bridges? Maybe you can add that information?

I don't sugest to use constuction:highway, the tag highway=construction is well established.
In case of roads which do no longer exist the tag highway=disused is simply wrong, in the past highway=razed was used for that, now it should be razed:highway=*
If you use OSM as part of your GIS you still should try to contribute in a way that is acepted by the community.

OK, I've restored the route relations here:
changeset/63643711

OK, I am trying to fix this. The river is already restored...

Hab es wieder auf path zurückgeändert.
Wäre nett, wenn Du mal auf CS Kommentare oder posts reagieren würdest.

Moin! Schau bitte noch mal auf den Weg way/635440976
Ist mir wegen highway=p aufgefallen,sollte wohl eigentlich ein geschlossener Weg mit highway=pedestrian sein?

Hi! I've noticed that you added some highway=disused like this one recently.
The tag is not often used for this, better use e..g. disused:highway=service because this also tells us what the closed road was used for. See also osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
I wonder if you really mapped the closed road because I don't see any road in BDOrtho IGN?

Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've noticed this changeset because of the unusual tag highway=crossing. Was this tag suggested by Go Map ?
If I got that right the sat images show a bridge and steps or ramps connecting this bridge with the primary roads. The bridge itself is not connected to the sidewalks next to primary roads, so it should be tagged
highway=footway + bridge=yes + layer=1
Next, draw the to ways which connect it to the road network.
Maybe add sidewalk=left or sidewalk=right to the primary roads where this is feasable.

Hi Andy,
well, so this will be one of many unanswered cs comments unless sabiyana is still active for OSM...

oops, meant footway, not path

what do you mean? I see that you added the note but it was and still is a abandoned:highway=path

I agree that it should be kept in this case. Maybe add a note that points to this discussion?