OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
31158928 over 10 years ago

please review:
way/198553702 now has the invalid tag
highway=unclassified;track
I think it changes at node/2086756742,
maybe also the maxspeed value changes
here?

34122527 over 10 years ago

please review:
way/104366705 (Gregory Road)
still has the fixme=name tag
and now has an invalid
highway=unclassified;track
tag

32683546 over 10 years ago

the part was in an area where Bing shows
no hires pictures, so I tried to find it in
Google earth. I think that is allowed?

32683546 over 10 years ago

yes, sorry, I did not notice that this changeset has such a large bbox,
and I don't remember the exact place anymore nor how I got there :-(

33696964 over 10 years ago

please review:
I assume the relation should get the tag
colour=red instead of many highways in this area?
Also, way/78188590
has now the invalid tag
highway=unclassified;track

29041538 over 10 years ago

please review, the relation/4620474
has an invalid highway tag;
highway=pedestrian;residential
I am not sure why you created this mp-relation ?
I assume the area in the north is simply
"amenity=parking parking=surface", and
the way/329840758 should be tagged
as highway=residential; junction=roundabout

34245296 over 10 years ago

please review,
way/372338082 looks as it is going to nowhere and is is going back and force

25912595 over 10 years ago

please review,
type is missing, way/306648963 is not closed and maybe should be connected with other way/306642530 ?

34352479 over 10 years ago

danke Dir!
JOSM meint übrigens, das sport=golf
falsch ist, obwohl im wiki
leisure=golf_course#Details_within_a_golf_course
nur "implies golf=sport" steht.
Unnötig also, aber falsch?

34114616 over 10 years ago

see way/250710591
I wonder why that small area in the south is not landuse=residential.
I found this because OSM Inspector
marks it as an error, see
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/

34114616 over 10 years ago

please review way/250710591
Why is the small square in the south
left out ?

32099200 over 10 years ago

please review, what is this?

32683546 over 10 years ago

Google earth shows this
junction much closer to the city

34210532 over 10 years ago

way/372076234 looks wrong, pictures
that I can find show either no cycleway
on this side of the road or one that
runs next to the primary road and
crosses below it

17434271 over 10 years ago

this produced lots of wrong addr:interpolation ways,
e.g.
way/234360884,way 234363130
should probably be combined or
each one neads an additional addr:housenumber node

Also a lot of street names are spelled differently (lower case/upper case)

32378233 over 10 years ago

Hi yosiken,
why do you add a line to the center of a building polygon?
It is not rendered and OSM Inspector
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/
considers them as self-intersecting.

7509071 over 10 years ago

okay, thanks

7509071 over 10 years ago

please review:
no tags on outer way or mp-relation
after this change.
relation/1466957

27572043 over 10 years ago

schon klar, ich wusste nur nicht,
ob irgendwelche Tags beabsichtigt waren.
Danke!

33954201 over 10 years ago

thanks, I'll fix a few more problems in this area