OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
9876185 over 10 years ago

okay, I was just curious about this uncommon tag ;-)

7925165 over 10 years ago

is it okay to change
ford=long to ford=yes ?

34407237 over 10 years ago

I see. Sorry again.

9876185 over 10 years ago

Hi Richard,

amenity=* and used=no probably means something like disused:amenity?

34414016 over 10 years ago

Hallo palimpadum,

bin auf diesen changeset gestossen,
weil in einem Weg das tag
disusded:highway=track
(Tippfehler) auftaucht.
Abgesehen davon: Was bedeutet
disused:highway ?
Habe dazu nichts im wiki gefunden.

31686191 over 10 years ago

this left an invalid no_u_turn restriction.
I guess this was not intended?
See relation/4872354

31316254 over 10 years ago

please review, the road has now the invalid
tag highway=unclassified;road
It should be either unclassified or road.

34407237 over 10 years ago

Hi YP,

thanks for reviewing my changes and
sorry for destroying data. I meant to remove simple typos.

In this case Bing shows a normal road junction which is not a passing place
as described in the wiki:
osm.wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dpath

Gerd

28205335 over 10 years ago

Hi Flachfisch,

I think the previous version was better.
Bing shows a change in the road type
I've divided the roads again

33462312 over 10 years ago

okay, dannn würde ich den
privaten Teil als
highway=service
und den anderen mit
highway=residential
mappen.

34384324 over 10 years ago

sorry, I only speak english and german.

33462312 over 10 years ago

Tüschener Weg hat jetzt
highway=service;residential
und läuft laut Bing quer durch
Grünflächen. Ist Bing hier nicht mehr
aktuell? Und ist der Weg tatsächlich Teil
der Buslinien?

34359896 over 10 years ago

okay,sorry, I've reverted that change.
The tag contact:housenumber is only used once in the database.

34247945 over 10 years ago

highway=crossing should be used for nodes,
not for ways, see
highway=crossing

34169634 over 10 years ago

This change left a relation without
type, I guess this was not intended,
so I'll add the tag
type=multipolygon to the relation
again