The wiki highway=traffic_signals#Traffic_signals_for_pedestrians says "Add the following tags in addition to highway=traffic_signals for pedestrian crossings if the entire crossing is represented by a single node, or to each highway=crossing nodes if the pedestrian crossings are tagged on their own (strongly recommended). "

This crossing is not represented by a single node.

Hi!
What is meant with highway=погорелова ?
way/101311183

Hi!
Please check highway="carrer de València"
on way/22725910
I assume you wanted to change the name
instead of the highway tag?

One more link:
osm.wiki/Waterways#Man-made_structures

Hi!
I've noticed that you used highway=bridge for a few ways crossing waterways. The usual way is to give the bridge the tag bridge=yes.
Typically you have either a highway=* + bridge=yes + layer=1
or waterway=* + tunnel=culvert + layer=-1
in this situation.
See also bridge=*
and tunnel=*

Hi! Please review typo highway=44 on way/540424568
I assume you meant height=44?

OK, I don't know about the nodes shared with the rails, but the other two are obviously nodes shared by a footway=crossing and a major road, so highway=crossing is the right tag. The tag highway=traffic_signals is only used for simple crossroads of two major roads.

My understanding is that you have a highway=crossing as described in
crossing=*

I think you should have highway=crossing + crossing=traffic_signals instead of
highway=traffic_signals + crossing=traffic_signals

Hi!
I've noticed this change because of the unusual highway=residential_link used here:
way/540261399
Besides that residential_link should not be used I think it is a secondary_link or just hw=residential.

Hi!
I've changed highway=crossing to highway=footway + footway=crossing here:
way/540282359
I've also changed the nodes from highway=traffic_signals to highway=crossing. Please review.

Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've noticed this change because of the tag highway=crossing used on a way like here:
way/540054529
This tag is meant to be used on the node shared by the major road and the footway. The footway itself is mapped with highway=footway + footway=crossing.
I did not yet change it because you connected the way with a node that is tagged highway=traffic_signals and I think the footway should not use that node. Please review my changes: changeset/53764132

Moin!
Bitte verwende highway=crossing nur für den Node, den Fußweg und (Haupt-)Straße gemeinsam haben. Der Fußweg selbst wird wie immer mit highway=footway und zusätzlich mit footway=crossing erfaßt.
Im Falle von way/540196303 läuft der Weg auch noch ohne Verbindung über einen Fußweg, vielleicht ist es eine Brücke?
Siehe auch osm.wiki/DE:Key:crossing

Hi!
Please don't use Bing where Japan GSI ortho Imagery is available. Bing is not ortorectified enough.

Hi!
Why did you change highway=residential to highway=Road here?
way/423065465
The previous value highway=residential looks correct to me.

Hi!
Please review typo highway=unclassifiedth on way/120574672
Looks like a highway=residential to me.

Hi and welcome to OSM!
You (accidentially?) changed the highway=trunk instead of adding / changing a node on this way. I've reverted that change.
Please see osm.wiki/Tag%3Ahighway%3Dspeed_camera

Moin!
Das Tag highway=mini_roundabout is nur für nodes. Die vorherige Version war also "richtiger". Was hat Dir daran nicht gefallen? Siehe auch
osm.wiki/DE:Tag:junction%3Droundabout#Verwechslungsgefahr

Hi!

Please don't use highway=mini_roundabout for ways. The tag is only meant for nodes when you don't want to draw the circular way.
way/171687478
I also think that this way way/366464218 is connected to Rue de la Landes.
Please review my changes here:changeset/53706973
One other problem:
Is it "Rue de la Lande" or "Rue de la Landes" (note the extra "s") ?

Hi!
Please review highway=closed on
way/421188890
The tag is only used here. If the road is disused, I think disused:highway=residential would be better. See also osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix