Moin!
Schau mal bitte auf highway=yes an
way/370202635
Da hängt ein proposed=residential dran,
ich vermute, das sollte bei highway hin?

Moin!
Ich wundere mich, dass es für die Brücke so detailierte access Attribute gibt, aber nicht für den Rest vom "Wirtschaftsweg".
way/46506382

Moin!
Die "Gebäudenummern" sehen für mich nach Hausnummern (addr:housenumber) aus. Oder ist das hier ein Sonderfall?
Beispiel:
osm.org
/way/244944709

Hi!
I've fixed typo highway=driveway here:
way/292583076
but I think you should review the access tags.I think it is better to have them on the way, not only on the gates. Maybe split the way at the gate. Besides that I wonder why you set access=destination and overwrite it with yes for almost everything at the gates.

Thanks for the quick reaction. I tried to find out if the bridge should be part of the trail.
As of now, the trail crossies the waterway
way/481291133
and there is neither a ford nor a bridge.
I just hoped that know more.

Moin!
Du hast hier aus einem Gebäude eine Straße gemacht. Absicht?
way/263132953

Moin!
Schau mal bitte auf
way/374418426
Die Fläche ist größtenteils von Autobahnen bedeckt, da macht natural=scrub eigentlich keinen Sinn.
Ich würde nur die großen Flächen zwischen den Spuren so mappen. An den Straßenrändern gibt es da nur noch ein paar Hecken (barrier=hedge)

Hi!
Please review highway=yes
on way/365990678
Bing only shows trees. Is it a path or an abandoned road?

Hi!
Please check the "Maine Huts Trail"
way/477213220
near this bridge:
way/481291132
I assume the trail should be split to use this brdige?
It might be better to use a relation to map "Maine Huts Trail". See
osm.wiki/Walking_Routes
Let me know if I can help you with that.

Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've noticed this change because you used highway=crossing for a way here
way/527949637
and here
way/527949648
The tag is onöy meant for the node shared by a minor way (footway, cycleway) with a major road. I assume you used it accidentially here?

Hi!
I try to understand what highway=historical means here:
way/441835222
and
way/462621213
Do you want to map that there was a road in the past which no longer exists?
Please see osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
for better tags. There are also a few route restrictions which are probably no longer needed, they all share this via node:
node/4395333385

Bitte ändern. Ich finde, wir haben wirklich genug etablierte Möglichkeiten, einen Weg zu mappen, den es nicht gibt.
ciao, Gerd

My understanding is that you can stop there to access this viewpoint:
node/4230873933
A rest_area is probably larger. Please review my changes
changeset/52378510

Please review my changes:
changeset/52375797
I am not sure if there is really a ford here:
node/1817612067
Maybe the water goes through a tunnel=culvert?

Hi!
Please review this "roundabout":
way/527093973
See junction=roundabout

Sorry, forgot the link to the road:
way/526838772

Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've noticed this change because of the rarely used tag highway="de servicio"
Please use the english values as listed here:
highway=*
You should also connect the roads so that they share a node.
You should not connect a road with the nodes of a buildings unless you tag this node as entrance.
Hope this helps, happy mapping!

Hi!
Please review typo highway=1
on way/425847926
and way/425847918

Hi!
You used highway=passing_place on a way here. The area looks more like a highway=rest_area to me. The value passing_place should only be used on nodes. Do you think that this place was created to allow two vehicle to pass each other?

Hi!
Please review way/515978533
This looks like a junction=roundabout
or maybe just a circular way with highway=residenital (I can't see an obstacle in the middle on the sat images). The tag highway=mini_roundabout should only be used on nodes.